History
  • No items yet
midpage
2020 Ohio 871
Ohio Ct. App.
2020
Read the full case

Background

  • Raymond A. Miller pleaded guilty in Geauga C.P. to charges; later filed a pro se petition for postconviction relief under R.C. 2953.21 claiming ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • Miller's principal claim: defense counsel coerced him into pleading guilty by (initially) telling him Miller's wife/co-defendant would testify against him.
  • Counsel later apologized and told Miller the wife would not testify; Miller also admits he learned she would not testify from in-person visits and correspondence before the plea.
  • At the change-of-plea hearing Miller affirmed he was satisfied with counsel, denied threats or promises, and voluntarily entered the plea.
  • Trial court first dismissed Miller's petition (res judicata/jurisdiction); this court remanded limited to Miller’s claim that relied on matters outside the trial record. On remand the trial court again dismissed without a hearing, finding no substantive grounds under R.C. 2953.21(D)/(F).
  • The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding Miller did not plead sufficient operative facts to show counsel’s performance was deficient or that he was prejudiced such that he would not have pled but for counsel’s error.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the petition set forth substantive grounds under R.C. 2953.21 requiring a hearing on an ineffective-assistance claim that counsel coerced Miller’s guilty plea by (initially) saying his wife would testify Miller: counsel coerced plea by threatening wife would testify; that ineffective assistance rendered plea involuntary and requires a hearing State: Miller knew (from wife and counsel’s correction) she would not testify; plea colloquy shows voluntariness; petitioner failed to allege sufficient operative facts of deficiency or prejudice Court affirmed dismissal without a hearing: petitioner failed to allege sufficient operative facts under Strickland to show deficient performance or prejudice; counsel’s error was corrected before plea and Miller voluntarily pled

Key Cases Cited

  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (establishes two‑pronged ineffective-assistance standard: deficiency and prejudice)
  • State v. Gondor, 112 Ohio St.3d 377 (2006) (standard of review for dismissing postconviction petitions)
  • State v. Calhoun, 86 Ohio St.3d 279 (1999) (procedural principles for postconviction relief filings)
  • State v. Jackson, 64 Ohio St.2d 107 (1980) (petitioner’s burden to submit evidentiary documents with sufficient operative facts)
  • State v. Pierce, 127 Ohio App.3d 578 (1998) (affidavits in support of postconviction petitions are generally accepted as true)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Miller
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 9, 2020
Citations: 2020 Ohio 871; 2019-G-0226
Docket Number: 2019-G-0226
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Miller, 2020 Ohio 871