History
  • No items yet
midpage
2019 Ohio 4275
Ohio Ct. App.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Indicted for carrying a concealed weapon and improperly handling firearms in a motor vehicle; pleaded guilty to the handling count on November 20, 2017 and the CCW count was dismissed.
  • Sentenced to three years of community control on January 5, 2018; no direct appeal was filed.
  • On January 31, 2019 Miller filed a petition for postconviction relief asserting ineffective assistance of counsel and that his plea was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent.
  • Trial court denied the petition on February 27, 2019, finding Miller failed to present sufficient operative facts or show prejudice to merit an evidentiary hearing.
  • The record included a signed Crim.R. 11 plea form and plea hearing colloquy in which Miller acknowledged waiving trial rights and that counsel had effectively represented him; no Crim.R. 32.1 motion to withdraw the plea was filed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether petition alleged sufficient operative facts to require an evidentiary hearing State: petition and record do not show operative facts or prejudice Miller: alleged ineffective assistance and involuntary plea warrant a hearing Denied—petition lacked sufficient operative facts and prejudice; no hearing required
Failure to file a motion to suppress State: Miller did not identify what should have been suppressed or any basis for a motion Miller: counsel was ineffective for not filing a suppression motion Denied—no facts showing a suppression motion would have succeeded, so no prejudice shown
Failure to subpoena witnesses / refusal to take case to trial State: Miller failed to identify witnesses or their expected testimony and did not timely seek new counsel Miller: counsel refused to subpoena witnesses (including FBI) and declined trial Denied—Miller waived trial rights at plea and did not present operative facts showing prejudice
Failure to advise appeal rights State: plea form and colloquy show Miller was advised of appeal rights Miller: counsel failed to advise him of appeal rights Denied—written plea form and hearing contradict claim; no relief

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Jackson, 64 Ohio St.2d 107 (1980) (petitioner must plead operative facts showing counsel incompetence and resulting prejudice to obtain a hearing)
  • State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136 (1989) (adopts Strickland framework for ineffective-assistance claims in Ohio)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (two-prong test: deficient performance and resulting prejudice)
  • State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391 (1976) (prejudice inquiry applied in ineffective-assistance analysis)
  • Rivera v. United States, 318 F.2d 606 (9th Cir. 1963) (conclusory allegations of ineffective assistance are insufficient for a hearing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Miller
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 15, 2019
Citations: 2019 Ohio 4275; 2019CA00046
Docket Number: 2019CA00046
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Miller, 2019 Ohio 4275