State v. McNear
2022 Ohio 2365
Ohio Ct. App.2022Background
- In December 2019, two days after his 15th birthday, D’Shaun McNear used a firearm to carjack an elderly woman and, the next day, carjacked another woman after a Target parking-lot encounter; he then led police on a high-speed chase.
- During the chase he struck another vehicle and drove onto a sidewalk, killing a 13-year-old and severely injuring an 11-year-old; he fled the scene and was later arrested.
- McNear was bound over to adult court and indicted in two separate Cuyahoga County cases with multiple counts (murder, involuntary manslaughter, aggravated vehicular homicide/assault, aggravated robbery, failure to comply, weapons under disability, thefts), many with firearm specifications.
- He pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to a set of amended counts across both cases, reserving a sentencing range of roughly 15–58 years; the trial court imposed an aggregate indefinite prison term of 26 to 31 years.
- The sentencing journal entries contained clerical errors about the stated prison term, and the court — without announcing it at the sentencing hearing — imposed a lifetime class-two driver’s-license suspension via entry.
- McNear appealed, raising four assignments of error: (1) Reagan Tokes sentencing law unconstitutional; (2) ineffective assistance of counsel; (3) improper consecutive sentences; (4) Crim.R. 43(A) violation because license suspension imposed by journal entry only.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (State) | Defendant's Argument (McNear) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constitutionality of Reagan Tokes Law | Law is constitutional; sentence lawful | Law unconstitutional per this court's earlier Daniel decision | Overruled McNear; en banc Delvallie controls and upholds Reagan Tokes |
| Ineffective assistance of counsel | Counsel objected; even if not, no prejudice because law constitutional | Counsel failed to properly raise constitutional challenge to Reagan Tokes | Overruled; counsel objected and no prejudice shown |
| Consecutive sentences | Court made and journalized required R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings; juvenile history and conduct support consecutives | Record does not clearly and convincingly support consecutive findings | Overruled; findings supported by record and incorporated into entry |
| Crim.R. 43(A) / license suspension imposed by entry | No prejudice; outcome same if pronounced at hearing | Lifetime class-two suspension was not pronounced at sentencing; defendant absent when imposed | Sustained in part: lifetime class-two suspension vacated; remanded for resentencing limited to license suspension and correction of journal entries |
Key Cases Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (establishes two-prong ineffective-assistance standard)
- State v. Trimble, 122 Ohio St.3d 297, 911 N.E.2d 242 (Ohio 2009) (applies Strickland standard in Ohio)
- State v. Delvallie, 185 N.E.3d 536 (8th Dist. 2022) (en banc upholding Reagan Tokes Law for this district)
- State v. Bonnell, 16 N.E.3d 659 (Ohio 2014) (trial court must note consideration of statutory criteria and incorporate findings in entry for consecutive sentences)
- State v. Edmonson, 715 N.E.2d 131 (Ohio 1999) (trial court’s sentencing duties and required analysis)
- State v. Marcum, 59 N.E.3d 1231 (Ohio 2016) (standard of appellate review for felony sentences under R.C. 2953.08(G)(2))
- State v. Hand, 73 N.E.3d 448 (Ohio 2016) (juvenile adjudications may be considered in adult sentencing for history)
- State ex rel. Cruzado v. Zaleski, 856 N.E.2d 263 (Ohio 2006) (clerical errors in journal entries may be corrected nunc pro tunc)
- State v. Miller, 940 N.E.2d 924 (Ohio 2010) (Crim.R.36 authority to correct clerical sentencing errors)
