State v. Longoria
301 Kan. 489
| Kan. | 2015Background
- A.D., a 14-year-old girl, was found murdered and burned near a Great Bend asphalt plant; DNA and gasoline-linked evidence tied Longoria to the crime scene and vehicle used.
- Longoria, who moved to Great Bend in 2010, engaged in a lengthy pattern of text messages with A.D. to pursue a relationship, while denying contact at trial.
- Forensic evidence included a DNA semen stain on the car floor mat and gasoline residues on Longoria’s shoes; an AutoZone gasoline jug near the burial site and a collection of personal items were found along roadside ditches.
- Longoria was arrested after a high-speed pursuit in a Venture Ford Explorer that had been missing; a redacted arrest video was admitted over objection.
- The jury convicted Longoria of capital murder (based on aggravated sodomy and attempted rape), vehicle burglary, and theft, and sentenced him to life without parole for capital murder plus concurrent/consecutive terms for other offenses.
- Additional trial developments included DNA, duct tape patterns on the victim, and various witnesses supporting or challenging the State’s theory, culminating in a direct appeal with eight challenged issues.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Venue change due to pretrial publicity | Longoria asserts presumed and statutory prejudice from pervasive publicity | State contends no abuse of discretion; venue denial was proper | No abuse of discretion; no presumptive prejudice established |
| Failure to instruct felony murder as a lesser included offense | Felony murder should have been instructed as a lesser included offense | Amendments retroactively exclude felony murder as a lesser included offense; no reversible error | Not reversible; retroactive amendment applies; no new trial required |
| Failure to instruct unintentional but reckless second-degree murder | Should have instructed on reckless second-degree murder as lesser included offense | Evidence supports premeditation; skip rule forecloses relief | Not reversible; evidence supports premeditated murder; skip rule absence does not mandate instruction |
| Admission of before-death photograph of A.D. | Photograph was irrelevant or unduly prejudicial | Photo identified victim and aided proof of identity; probative value outweighs prejudice | Photograph admissible; relevant and not unduly prejudicial |
| Prosecutor's rebuttal misconduct | Sarcasm and insinuations biased jurors | Prosecutor used sarcasm within latitude allowed; arguments tied to evidence | No reversible misconduct; within wide latitude and tied to evidence |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Mireles, 297 Kan. 339 (2013) (felony murder as lesser included offense previously recognized)
- State v. Cheever, 295 Kan. 229 (2012) (felony murder treated as lesser included offense prior to 2013 amendments)
- State v. Carr, 300 Kan. 1 (2014) (Skilling factors for presumed prejudice and venue-change analysis)
- State v. Plummer, 295 Kan. 156 (2012) (skip rule discussed as route to harmless error)
- State v. Williams, 295 Kan. 506 (2012) (standard for reviewing first-on-appeal failure-to-instruct issues)
