State v. Kendall Whitaker
79 A.3d 795
| R.I. | 2013Background
- December 4, 2002: birthday party in Kennedy’s Providence apartment; gunfire injures three, Joel Jackson dies.
- Whitaker arrives with Robinson and Isom; attempt to steal Jackson’s chain triggers struggle and gunfire.
- Robinson and Isom testify about Whitaker’s armed presence and intent to steal the chain; Richardson places Whitaker with a gun.
- Robinson removes Jackson’s chain; medallion later recovered by police; Whitaker drives Robinson to hospital and is arrested.
- Whitaker is charged with murder, robbery, conspiracy to rob, assault with a dangerous weapon, carrying a handgun without a license, and related firearm offenses; acquitted of conspiracy and Toby assault, others convicted, leading to this appeal.
- Whitaker contends trial errors—new-trial denial, jury instructions, judgment of acquittal, custody instruction, leading questions, unrecorded bench conferences; appeal denied.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight of the evidence for a new trial | Court should defer to the thirteenth juror; credible circumstantial proof supports verdict. | Witness credibility issues undermine the verdict and justify a new trial. | Affirmed; denial upheld. |
| Sufficiency of evidence for aiding and abetting | Evidence supports aiding-and-abetting based on Whitaker’s presence and actions. | Insufficient evidence preserved for appeal; acquittal on conspiracy blocks aiding. | Waiver; issue not reviewable. |
| Jury instructions on aiding/intent and overall clarity | Instructions properly reflected law and evidence; no misdirection. | Instructions confusing; lacking explicit intent instruction. | Not reversible error; instructions upheld. |
| Motion for judgment of acquittal and pyramiding of inferences | Circumstantial evidence and witnesses’ testimony sufficient to support guilt. | Inferences improperly pyramided from ambiguous facts. | Denied; evidence sufficient. |
| Custody instruction to jury | Custody note was neutral and did not prejudice; Fenner procedure not required here. | Custody instruction improper and prejudicial; reversible error. | Not reversible error; Fenner cautions observed in practice. |
| Leading questions and unrecorded bench conferences | Leading questions within trial court’s discretion; not reversible. | Leading questions/coaching; unrecorded bench issues prejudicial. | Not grounds for reversal; objections and recording deficiencies waived. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Cerda, 957 A.2d 382 (R.I. 2008) (weight-of-evidence review; credibility determinations by trial court respected)
- State v. Rosario, 35 A.3d 938 (R.I. 2012) (thirteenth-juror standard; credibility and circumstantial support upheld)
- State v. Karngar, 29 A.3d 1232 (R.I. 2011) (preservation rules for new-trial on sufficiency vs weight)
- State v. Vargas, 21 A.3d 347 (R.I. 2011) (pyramiding inferences; corroborating circumstantial evidence sufficient)
- State v. Caruolo, 524 A.2d 575 (R.I. 1987) (circumstantial evidence sufficiency standard)
- State v. Abdullh, 967 A.2d 469 (R.I. 2009) (standard for reviewing denial of motion for new trial)
- State v. Imbruglia, 913 A.2d 1022 (R.I. 2008) (standard of review for jury-instruction adequacy)
- State v. Fenner, 503 A.2d 518 (R.I. 1986) (custody-injury guidance; Fenner procedure guiding custody admonitions)
- State v. D’Alo, 435 A.2d 317 (R.I. 1981) (bench conferences recording necessity; preservation)
- State v. Reyes, 984 A.2d 606 (R.I. 2009) (objection specificity on record to preserve appeal)
