State v. Kemp
2011 Ohio 4235
Ohio Ct. App.2011Background
- Kemp was charged with drug trafficking, drug possession, and possessing criminal tools, with forfeiture specifications; he moved to suppress evidence which the court denied and was convicted after a no-contest plea.
- Police stopped Kemp after learning the vehicle owner had a suspended license under FRA, and Kemp did not have a valid license or registration for the car.
- Kemp was arrested for driving with a suspended license and placed in a patrol vehicle; the car was later towed.
- During an inventory search conducted as part of the tow process, officers found 1.16 grams of crack cocaine, two scales, and additional property (cash, cell phone, camcorder) in the car.
- Kemp argued the vehicle search violated the Fourth Amendment; the trial court denied the motion to suppress, and Kemp appealed the denial.
- The appellate court affirmed, holding the inventory search of the towed vehicle was permissible under the inventory exception to the warrant requirement.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the inventory search of the towed vehicle complied with Fourth Amendment limits | Kemp | Kemp | Inventory search valid; no Fourth Amendment violation |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Burnside, 100 Ohio St.3d 152 (2003) (standard for suppression review; mixed law and fact)
- State v. Mesa, 87 Ohio St.3d 105 (1999) (inventory search exception to warrant requirement)
- State v. Peagler, 76 Ohio St.3d 496 (1996) (inventory search permissible when impounded)
- Colorado v. Bertine, 479 U.S. 367 (1987) (inventory searches in impoundment context)
- State v. Robinson, 58 Ohio St.2d 478 (1979) (inventory searches not pretextual rummaging)
- State v. Caponi, 12 Ohio St.3d 302 (1984) (inventory searches must be reasonable and not investigatory)
- United States v. Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009) (limits vehicle searches incident to arrest; exceptions remain for inventory searches)
