State v. Jenkins
2016 Ohio 5190
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2016Background
- On May 1, 2013 Sgt. Neil Laughlin followed and stopped a vehicle after observing it change lanes without signaling. Terrell Jenkins was the front passenger; a woman drove and a man sat in back.
- Laughlin approached on the passenger side, smelled a strong odor of marijuana from the open front passenger window, and radioed for backup.
- Occupants were removed and questioned separately; inconsistent statements about destination increased officers’ suspicions.
- After additional officers arrived, they searched the vehicle and found cocaine under the front passenger seat.
- Jenkins was indicted for drug trafficking, possession, and drug paraphernalia; he moved to suppress the stop, search, and any statements. The trial court denied the motion; Jenkins pleaded no contest and was sentenced to three years. He appealed the suppression denial.
Issues
| Issue | Jenkins' Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legality of the initial traffic stop | Stop lacked reasonable, articulable suspicion; officer testimony not credible | Officer observed lane change without signal, authorizing stop under traffic law | Court upheld stop: officer had reasonable, articulable suspicion to stop for a traffic violation |
| Extension of the stop / vehicle search | Officer impermissibly prolonged the stop to search for drugs; no marijuana found | Officer smelled a strong, recent marijuana odor, providing additional suspicion to continue detention and investigate | Court held smell of marijuana gave additional articulable facts to justify continued detention and investigation |
| Suppression of post-stop statements (Miranda) | Statements were taken without Miranda warnings and should be suppressed | No specific challenged statements identified; defendant failed to show prejudice | Court rejected the Miranda claim for lack of identified statements or demonstrated prejudice |
| Exclusion of evidence as fruits of unconstitutional search | All evidence should be excluded due to Fourth Amendment violations | No constitutional violation occurred; evidence admissible | Court affirmed denial of suppression and admission of evidence |
Key Cases Cited
- Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 (1983) (not all seizures require probable cause; investigatory detentions are permitted)
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (officer must have specific, articulable facts supporting reasonable suspicion for a stop)
- Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925) (Fourth Amendment facts judged by an objective standard)
- State v. Burnside, 100 Ohio St.3d 152 (2003) (appellate review accepts trial court factual findings if supported and then applies de novo review to legal conclusion)
- State v. Mays, 119 Ohio St.3d 406 (2008) (officer may stop a vehicle upon reasonable suspicion the driver committed a traffic violation)
