History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Hoover
2018 Ohio 4736
Ohio Ct. App.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • On Jan. 5, 2018, an Ohio State Highway Patrol trooper stopped a 2009 Nissan after observing it travel on/near the double-yellow center line late at night.
  • Trooper Coffland testified he saw a gap between the tire and the farthest center line and that the vehicle was on top of the double-yellow line for a brief moment; cruiser dashcam recorded the encounter but video quality was poor due to an older system and some snow/salt on the road.
  • Appellee Robert Hoover was cited for OMVI (R.C. 4511.19) and for operating left of center (R.C. 4511.25); he pleaded not guilty and moved to suppress evidence from the traffic stop, limiting the challenge to the stop’s propriety.
  • The municipal court held a suppression hearing (trooper was lone witness and dashcam video was reviewed) and granted the motion, concluding the dashcam did not clearly show Hoover crossing the double-yellow line and stating the trooper lacked probable cause.
  • The State appealed, arguing the stop was supported by sufficient evidence of a lane violation and that the municipal court erred in suppressing evidence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the traffic stop was lawful based on a marked-lanes violation Trooper observed lane departure (tire over/on double-yellow); dashcam corroborates enough to justify stop Dashcam/video does not clearly show crossing; trial court found no probable cause for stop Appellate court reversed: trial court applied wrong standard (probable cause). Matter remanded to assess under reasonable, articulable suspicion standard and suppression order vacated

Key Cases Cited

  • Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (1996) (reasonable-suspicion and probable-cause determinations reviewed de novo)
  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (officers may stop and briefly detain on reasonable, articulable suspicion)
  • State v. Fanning, 1 Ohio St.3d 19 (1982) (appellate standards for reviewing suppression rulings)
  • State v. Mays, 119 Ohio St.3d 406 (2008) (probable cause not required for traffic stops; reasonable, articulable suspicion suffices)
  • State v. Burnside, 100 Ohio St.3d 152 (2003) (trial court as factfinder in suppression hearings; appellate deference to factual findings supported by evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Hoover
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 21, 2018
Citation: 2018 Ohio 4736
Docket Number: 18 CA 39
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.