State v. Hicks
2016 Ohio 5439
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2016Background
- On Nov. 13, 2014, Trooper Coverstone observed a southbound Ford Expedition on I-75 and paced it at 69–70 mph in a 65-mph zone after initially estimating ~71 mph in a 70 zone. He also observed the vehicle merge closely between cars.
- Coverstone stopped the vehicle, removed Hicks to the rear for safety, and noticed watery eyes and nervous behavior; Hicks said the car was a rental driven for his wife.
- Hicks rolled down the passenger window while retrieving the rental agreement; Coverstone immediately detected a strong odor of raw marijuana coming from the vehicle.
- A pat-down revealed marijuana butter on Hicks; a search of the vehicle revealed a small bag of marijuana, a blunt, an ecstasy pill, and later >300 oxycodone pills hidden in the rear quarter panel after the vehicle was towed.
- Hicks moved to suppress all evidence, arguing the stop lacked reasonable/articulable suspicion and was pretextual and that the stop was improperly extended; the trial court denied the motion and Hicks pled no contest to two counts of aggravated possession, receiving an aggregate three-year sentence.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the initial traffic stop was supported by reasonable, articulable suspicion/probable cause | State: Trooper observed speeding and unsafe following/encroachment, providing a lawful basis for the stop | Hicks: Trooper lacked sufficient basis; stop was pretextual and therefore unconstitutional | Court: Stop justified—trooper observed speeding (69–70 in 65) and unsafe merging/too-close following; lawful to stop vehicle |
| Whether the detention was unlawfully extended or exceeded permissible scope | State: Odor of raw marijuana was detected within minutes, giving probable cause to search and justify tow/search | Hicks: Even if stop began lawfully, detention/search/vehicle tow and later discovery exceeded permissible scope/length | Court: Odor was detected <2 minutes after stop, producing probable cause; scope and duration were reasonable and did not violate the Fourth Amendment |
Key Cases Cited
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (officers may briefly stop/detain on reasonable, articulable suspicion)
- State v. Mays, 894 N.E.2d 1204 (Ohio 2008) (traffic violations justify stops even if pretextual to investigate other crimes)
- Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000) (reasonable suspicion is a less demanding standard than probable cause)
- State v. Andrews, 565 N.E.2d 1271 (Ohio 1991) (totality-of-circumstances test and perspective of reasonable officer for assessing suspicion)
