State v. Guinto, 2013 Ohio 2180

Guinto was stopped for speeding on I-71; canine unit later alerted to drugs in his vehicle.
Trooper Morrison detained Guinto and Sweeting for questions and searched with a drug-detection dog after a 31-minute stop delay.
Two glass pipes with marijuana residue were found; Sweeting admitted ownership of one pipe.
Guinto was charged with possession of drug paraphernalia (misdemeanor) and speeding (minor misdemeanor).
Guinto moved to dismiss for speedy-trial violations and moved to suppress evidence; discovery issues delayed proceedings.
Trial court denied both motions; Guinto pled no contest and was convicted on the drug paraphernalia and speeding counts; sentencing followed

Issue	Plaintiff's Argument	Defendant's Argument	Held
Did Guinto's speedy-trial rights require discharge?	Guinto	Guinto	No discharge; 42 of 45 days elapsed; delays tolled appropriately and discovery issues reset clock
Was the detention valid after requesting the narcotics dog sniff?	State	Guinto	Detention reasonable; dog sniff lawfully supports search; no suppression

State v. Burnside, 100 Ohio St.3d 152 (Ohio 2003) (mixed evidence, de novo legal standard on suppression)
State v. Batchili, 113 Ohio St.3d 403 (2007) (requirement of reasonable suspicion for extended detentions; totality of circumstances)
State v. Keathley, 55 Ohio App.3d 130 (Ohio App. 1988) (detention duration includes license checks; reasonableness under totality of circumstances)
State v. McNamara, 124 Ohio App.3d 706 (Ohio App. 1997) (crime of suppression standard; applicability to factual findings)