122 So. 3d 531
La.2013Background
- Officers received an anonymous tip that a man selling items on Canal Street was also selling drugs and had a detailed description of the defendant.
- On the way to the scene, the informant corroborated that the defendant retrieved an item from behind a table and handed it to another for money.
- Police observed a man matching the description selling items as described near the table where the backpack was located.
- When approached, the defendant stated, “You are just doing your job, then do your job.”
- An officer smelled marijuana emanating from a backpack behind the table and retrieved it, finding a handgun and loose marijuana inside.
- The defendant was read his Miranda rights, and the search of the backpack proceeded, leading to suppression proceedings in the trial court.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the backpack search was valid under the Fourth Amendment | The plain smell doctrine/search was lawful. | The search should be suppressed as unlawful or not based on consent. | Search upheld; suppression reversed; evidence admissible. |
| Whether the encounter was consensual and not a seizure | Officers conducted a consensual stop permissible under Royer/Bostick. | The encounter impermissibly coerced or escalated into a seizure. | Consensual encounter; no Fourth Amendment seizure. |
| Whether plain view/plain smell exceptions apply to authorize the search | Plain smell from a lawful location justifies inspection and search. | Exceptions do not apply to justify the search absent proper basis. | Plain smell doctrine valid; search permissible. |
Key Cases Cited
- Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 (U.S. Supreme Court 1983) (consensual encounters do not trigger Fourth Amendment scrutiny)
- Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429 (U.S. Supreme Court 1991) (consensual approach to questioning does not require suspicion)
- Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (U.S. Supreme Court 1990) (plain view doctrine elements: lawful position, immediately incriminating, lawful access)
- State v. Willis, 843 So.2d 592 (La. App. 2 Cir. 2003) (plain view/related doctrines in Louisiana context)
- State v. Allen, 55 So.3d 756 (La. 2010) (plain smell exception extension of plain view)
- State v. Richardson, 23 So.3d 254 (La. 2009) (Louisiana framework for police encounters and searches)
