History
  • No items yet
midpage
2011 Ohio 5820
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • State v. Goodson concerned multiple drug offenses arising from a single August 9, 2005 buy-bust arrest.
  • The charges were possession of crack cocaine (R.C. 2925.11(A)); trafficking in less than one gram of cocaine by selling (R.C. 2925.03(A)(1)); trafficking in less than one gram by preparing for distribution (R.C. 2925.03(A)(2)); and possession of criminal tools, with forfeiture.
  • The trial court convicted all three drug offenses but later, following Cabrales, determined some offenses were not allied and merged only some of them.
  • On direct appeal, Goodson I affirmed most convictions but held that trafficking under R.C. 2925.03(A)(2) and possession under R.C. 2925.11(A) were allied and should merge, while the others could remain separate.
  • The Ohio Supreme Court remanded for application of State v. Johnson to determine allied offenses and proper merger, if any, and for resentencing consistent with that framework.
  • The current decision reverses the judgment as to sentencing and remands to allow the State to elect which allied offense to pursue for punishment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Are the three drug offenses allied offenses of similar import under Johnson? Goodson argues the offenses are allied and must merge. Goodson contends the offenses may be non-allied under prior Cabrales analysis. Yes; they are allied and must be merged.
If allied, how should sentencing proceed on remand? State will elect which allied offense to pursue. N/A Remand for resentencing with election by State.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153 (2010-Ohio-6314) (two-part test for allied offenses of similar import under 2941.25; same conduct and same act/state of mind)
  • State v. Cabrales, 118 Ohio St.3d 54 (2008-Ohio-1625) (allied offenses analysis prior to Johnson)
  • State v. Roy, 2011-Ohio-1992 (5th Dist. 2011) (same conduct and same act/state of mind framework)
  • State v. Whitfield, 124 Ohio St.3d 319 (2010-Ohio-2) (remedies when multiple allied offenses are merged)
  • State v. Goodson, 192 Ohio App.3d 246 (2011-Ohio-722) (original appellate decision applying Cabrales to merge offenses)
  • Dammons, 2011-Ohio-2908 (6th Dist. 2011) (confirming allied offenses analysis with trafficking and possession)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Goodson
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 10, 2011
Citations: 2011 Ohio 5820; 94954
Docket Number: 94954
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Goodson, 2011 Ohio 5820