History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Freeman
2011 Ohio 2663
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Freeman, a Staybridge maintenance worker, engaged in sexual activity with 15-year-old A.S. after providing marijuana.
  • A.S. smoked cannabis in Freeman’s van in a Staybridge parking lot while Freeman was in control of the environment.
  • A.S. testified she resisted at times; trial nurses and parents described her as 'zoned out' and impaired.
  • Freeman was convicted at a bench trial of four counts of rape (R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(c)) and two counts of gross sexual imposition (R.C. 2907.05(A)(5)) based on substantial impairment.
  • The trial court acquitted on several alternate theories but found guilt on the substantial impairment theory; appellate review concerns sufficiency and weight.
  • Appellate court affirms the convictions and sentence, concluding substantial impairment and Freeman’s knowledge of impairment were proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of the evidence Freeman argues the evidence did not prove substantial impairment or knowledge of impairment. Freeman contends the State failed to show victim impairment and defendant’s knowledge. Convictions sustained; sufficient evidence supported substantial impairment and knowledge.
Weight of the evidence The State’s evidence on impairment and Freeman’s knowledge was weak and could mislead the jury. The weight supports conviction; the jury could reasonably believe impairment and knowledge. Convictions not against the manifest weight; trial court did not misstate the facts.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Zeh, 31 Ohio St.3d 99 (Ohio 1987) (substantial impairment meaning based on common usage)
  • State v. Brady, 2007-Ohio-1453 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 2007) (substantial impairment shown by totality of circumstances)
  • Doss, 2008-Ohio-449 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 2008) (voluntary intoxication treated as impairment for purposes of knowledge)
  • In re King, 2002-Ohio-2313 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 2002) (evidence of victim impairment from substances considered)
  • State v. Blazer, 2010-Ohio-6367 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 2010) (impairment evidence from victim actions surrounding offense)
  • State v. Felton, 2010-Ohio-4105 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 2010) (physical impairment as basis for substantial impairment)
  • State v. Leonard, 104 Ohio St.3d 54 (Ohio 2004) (standard for reviewing sufficiency and manifest weight)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Freeman
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 2, 2011
Citation: 2011 Ohio 2663
Docket Number: 95511
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.