History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Flanagan
2012 Ohio 1516
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Copper theft at Crispin’s Auto Wrecking; ~200 pounds of high-grade copper missing overnight.
  • Appellant Flanagan turned in ~200 pounds of number-one copper to Legend Smelting, identified as the same copper; he was paid $568.40.
  • Law Enforcement investigated; Flanagan claimed he found the copper in the woods.
  • Indictment charged one count of receiving stolen property (fifth-degree felony, value $500–$5,000).
  • Trial resulted in guilty verdict; defendant sentenced to one year in prison plus 3 years post-release control.
  • On appeal, court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and modified sentence to remove mandatory post-release control or defer to parole authority.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether maximum term was appropriate Flanagan Flanagan Maximum term not an abuse of discretion; within range.
Whether post-release control was properly imposed State Flanagan Court erred; vacate three years post-release control; leave to Adult Parole Authority.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94 (2007-Ohio-3250) (postrelease control issues; partial voidance and remand guidance)
  • State v. Fischer, 128 Ohio St.3d 92 (2010-Ohio-6230) (modifies Bezak to require remand for postrelease control evaluation)
  • State v. Hunter, 8th Dist. No. 92032, 2009-Ohio-4194 (2009-Ohio-4194) (trial court cannot unilaterally impose postrelease control; parole authority governs)
  • State v. Kalish, 120 Ohio St.3d 23 (2008-Ohio-4912) (two-step review of felony sentences; compliance with statutes then abuse of discretion standard)
  • State v. Wells, 2010-Ohio-3126 (2010-Ohio-3126) (acknowledges statutory factors governing sentencing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Flanagan
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 28, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 1516
Docket Number: 11-CA-83
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.