History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Faranda
2011 Ohio 6083
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Faranda was delinquent of gross sexual imposition in juvenile court (2004) and classified as a juvenile sexually oriented offender under Megan’s Law, requiring annual address verification for ten years, which he complied with.
  • SB 10/Adam Walsh Act reclassified him as a Tier II juvenile sex offender, imposing address verification every 180 days for 20 years.
  • In 2009 Faranda pled guilty to amended charge of attempted failure to verify his address under R.C. 2923.02/2950.06, a fourth-degree felony, and received an 18-month term.
  • The Ohio Supreme Court later held in Bodyke that retroactive reclassification under the AWA is unconstitutional.
  • In 2010 Faranda moved to withdraw his guilty plea pro se based on Bodyke; the trial court did not act, and in 2011 counsel moved to withdraw, which the trial court denied.
  • The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding the unlawful reclassification cannot support the charged offense and that Faranda is entitled to withdraw his plea.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Faranda is entitled to withdraw his guilty plea based on unlawful AWA reclassification. Faranda (State) argues no withdrawal since reclassification was lawful. Faranda argues the reclassification under AWA was unconstitutional and the indictment predicated on it is invalid. Yes; conviction reversed and remanded for withdrawal of plea.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Bodyke, 126 Ohio St.3d 266 (2010) (retroactive reclassification unconstitutional)
  • State v. Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344 (2011) (AWA as applied to pre-S.B.10 offenses violates Ohio Constitution)
  • State v. Mestre, 2011-Ohio-5677 (2011) (unlawful reclassification cannot support predicate for crime; withdrawal proper)
  • State v. Gingell, 2011-Ohio-1481 (2011) (related unlawful reclassification holdings)
  • State v. Ortega-Martinez, 2011-Ohio-2540 (2011) (affirming unlawful reclassification implications)
  • State v. Ogletree, 2011-Ohio-5846 (2011) (supporting unlawful reclassification analysis)
  • In re Smith, 2008-Ohio-3234 (2008) (juvenile context of AWA reclassification (succeeded by Williams))
  • State v. D.J.S., 2011-Ohio-3374 (2011) (application of Williams to juvenile context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Faranda
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 23, 2011
Citation: 2011 Ohio 6083
Docket Number: 96807
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.