133 Conn. App. 105
Conn. App. Ct.2012Background
- Police pursuit of SUV after gunfire on New Haven green; SUV stops on highway; gunshot-related items thrown from windows.
- Tanika McCotter operates SUV; defendant sits in front passenger seat; Jayeron McCotter in rear.
- Thermal imager locates a .45 caliber Ruger handgun; shell casings located near Elm/College with inconclusive link to Ruger.
- Defendant charged with carrying without a permit, criminal possession, firearm possession, unlawful weapon in motor vehicle, and violation of protective order.
- Tanika McCotter’s Stevens testimony admitted as substantive evidence; she testified she and the passengers fired guns, though she later recanted.
- Jury found defendant guilty of unlawful possession of a weapon in a motor vehicle and criminal violation of a protective order; sentenced to seven years.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of evidence for unlawful possession | State argues Tanika McCotter’s testimony supports actual possession by defendant. | Eubanks contends insufficient proof he possessed a weapon in the vehicle. | Evidence sufficient when viewed with McCotter’s testimony and corroboration. |
| Prosecutorial impropriety in closing | State argues closing comments based on admitted testimony were proper. | Eubanks contends prosecutor relied on non-record statements as facts. | No reversible impropriety; comments harmless and within proper use of admitted evidence. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Arthurs, 121 Conn.App. 520 (2010) (sufficiency review standard; appellate standard of review)
- State v. Delossantos, 211 Conn. 258 (1989) (possession element in § 29-38 case law)
- State v. Carey, 228 Conn. 487 (1994) (hearsay and evidentiary review in sufficiency analysis)
- State v. Goriss, 108 Conn. App. 264 (2008) (jury may credit some testimony over others)
- State v. Arline, 223 Conn. 52 (1992) (improper impeachment and admission of evidence)
- State v. Fauci, 282 Conn. 23 (2007) (prosecutorial impropriety framework; two-step inquiry)
