State v. Driggins
2012 Ohio 5287
Ohio Ct. App.2012Background
- Defendant was convicted of murder, aggravated robbery, and aggravated burglary arising from Rankin’s killing during a Rankin home burglary; he was sentenced to life with parole eligibility after 38 years, later corrected after Baker.
- Defendant initially provided statements exculpating himself, then confessed after meetings with Ginn and police; multiple Miranda waivers occurred.
- Ginn, a mentor figure, facilitated a written statement; police denied coercion and asserted Ginn acted independently.
- At trial, the jury convicted on multiple counts including felony murder theories and firearm specifications; sentences were imposed consecutively.
- Defendant appealed raising 22 assignments of error, including suppression, Sixth Amendment issues, evidentiary rulings, jury instructions, allied offenses, and sentencing challenges, all affirmed on appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suppression of March 5 and 14 statements | Driggins’ statements were voluntary and properly Miranda-waived | Statements were coerced or improperly induced; Miranda rights not properly administered | Overruled: statements voluntary; waivers valid; no due process violation |
| Inducement and agent issue with Ginn | Ginn not an agent of the state; defendant initiated contact | Ginn coerced or induced confession on behalf of authorities | Overruled: no coercion; Ginn not an agent; voluntariness sustained |
| Sixth Amendment right to counsel during interrogation | Interviews occurred after initiation of proceedings; counsel not required | Counsel should have been present; interrogation violated | Overruled: Sixth Amendment not violated; proceedings had not yet invoked right to counsel at relevant times |
| Alleged illegal arrest and suppression grounds | Arrest justified; Terry-like stop supported by probable cause | Arrest unconstitutional; illegal stop | Overruled: arrest supported; suppression rejected |
| Constitutional public-trial right and witness intimidation | Court properly closed portions to prevent intimidation | Closure violated public trial right | Overruled: court acted within discretion to protect witnesses; closure proper |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Polk, 8th Dist. No. 84361, 2005-Ohio-774 (Ohio App. 8th Dist. 2005) (standard for mixed questions of law and fact on suppression review)
- State v. Fry, 125 Ohio St.3d 163 (2010-Ohio-1017) (felony-murder predicate mens rea governed by underlying felony)
- State v. Hanna, 95 Ohio St.3d 285 (2002-Ohio-2221) (intervening causes instruction adequate; intervening act theory)
- State v. Evans, 122 Ohio St.3d 381 (2009-Ohio-2974) (definition and scope of lesser included offenses; involuntary manslaughter relation)
- State v. Whitfield, 124 Ohio St.3d 319 (2010-Ohio-2) (state elects allied-offense conduct for sentencing; non-allied offenses may be sentenced separately)
