History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Davis
2011 Ohio 5630
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Airman Vincent Taylor was shot outside Whispers Nightclub; he survived but suffered permanent injuries.
  • Harris provided a description and later identified Davis in a photo array two days after the shooting.
  • Davis was subsequently arrested October 5, 2009; Airman Taylor recognized Davis on the news.
  • Davis was indicted on attempted murder, aggravated robbery, and felonious assault with firearm specifications; some counts were dismissed.
  • Davis moved to suppress the out-of-court identification; suppression court denied the motion.
  • At trial, the jury convicted Davis of aggravated robbery, felonious assault, and associated firearm specifications; sentenced to 18 years.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Prosecutorial misconduct standard at trial Davis argues misconduct denied fair trial. State contends conduct did not deprive fair trial. No reversible misconduct; trial fair.
Admissibility of photo-identification Identification was impermissibly suggestive and unreliable. Identification procedure not impermissibly suggestive; reliable. Photo array not inherently suggestive; identification deemed reliable.
Plea agreement enforcement State breached a lesser-sentence plea agreement after acceptance. No evidence of any plea negotiations or agreement. No enforceable plea agreement; assignment overruled.
Alibi jury instruction Trial court erred in alibi instruction; plain error. No plain error; defense waived or forfeited objection. No plain error; assignment overruled.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Mills, 62 Ohio St.3d 357 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992) (mixed question of law and fact in suppression review; appellate deference to trial court)
  • State v. Burnside, 100 Ohio St.3d 152 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003) (standard for reviewing eyewitness identification; reliability framework)
  • Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1977) (reliability vs. suggestiveness in lineup identifications)
  • Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1968) (due process standard for eyewitness identification reliability)
  • State v. Davis, 76 Ohio St.3d 107 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996) (five-factor test for reliability of identification)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Davis
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 2, 2011
Citation: 2011 Ohio 5630
Docket Number: 25399
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.