History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Cooper
2012 Ohio 555
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Cooper pled guilty in two cases: B-1001973-B for aggravated robbery, kidnapping, and related firearm specs; B-1002258 for aggravated robbery with firearm spec, in connection with two separate armed robberies at Fifth Third Bank and Cincinnati Credit Union.
  • The court joined the cases for sentencing, imposing consecutive terms for aggravated robbery, kidnapping, and firearm specs, totaling 18 years.
  • The same conduct supported both the aggravated robbery and kidnapping convictions in B-1001973-B; the kidnapping was brief and incidental to robbery.
  • Post-sentencing, the court did not orally inform Cooper of postrelease-control obligations as required by R.C. 2929.191 and related statutes.
  • The court vacated the challenged sentences and remanded for resentencing on one of the allied-offense counts and for proper postrelease-control notice in accordance with statutory requirements.
  • The court affirmed all other aspects of the judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Are aggravated robbery and kidnapping allied offenses of similar import? Cooper argues mergers were required under R.C. 2941.25. State contends separate animus existed for kidnapping. Yes; they are allied offenses and sentencing for both violated merger rules.
Was Cooper properly notified of postrelease control at sentencing? Court adequately notified; error not raised. Failure to notify violates statutory duty. Violation; postrelease-control notices must be given, so remand for proper notice.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 107 (Ohio Supreme Court-2010) (redefines allied-offense analysis focusing on conduct and animus)
  • State v. Logan, 60 Ohio St.2d 126 (Ohio Supreme Court-1979) (guides separate-animus analysis for kidnapping and another offense)
  • State v. Moss, 69 Ohio St.2d 515 (Ohio Supreme Court-1982) (framework for merger under R.C. 2941.25 when offenses share conduct)
  • State v. Rance, 85 Ohio St.3d 632 (Ohio Supreme Court-1999) (overruled prior Rance approach; focus on conduct to determine allied offenses)
  • State v. Whitfield, 124 Ohio St.3d 2010-Ohio-2 (Ohio Supreme Court-2010) (requires proper postrelease-control notice on resentencing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Cooper
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 15, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 555
Docket Number: C-110027 C-110028
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.