History
  • No items yet
midpage
291 P.3d 799
Or. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant was arrested for DUII on Aug 14, 2007, information issued Aug 15, 2007.
  • Trial originally set for Jan 28, 2008, then repeatedly postponed.
  • First trial on May 20, 2009 ended in mistrial; reset to Oct 7, 2009.
  • Defendant moved for dismissal under ORS 135.747 on Sept 30, 2009.
  • Trial court found 18.5 months of delay attributable to state and denied dismissal under ORS 135.750 for other reasons (hung jury, priorities, witness unavailability).
  • Court concluded ORS 135.747 Applies to pre-trial delay only and that failure to move before trial waives the right; Garner holding applied to second-trial delays with mistrial.]
  • The court affirmed the denial of the motion to dismiss; Bevel v. Gladden and waiver principles noted; ORS 135.747 does not govern second-trial delays.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether ORS 135.747 governs delay before a second trial after a prior mistrial Garner governs pre-trial timing limits Bevel/waiver principles render untimely filing ineffective ORS 135.747 applies to pre-trial delay; not to second-trial delay; no error.
Whether defendant waived statutory speedy-trial rights by delaying until after trial commenced Waiver via inaction before trial Rights were not preserved due to post-trial filing Waiver applies; failure to object before trial bars dismissal under 135.747.
Whether the delay before the first trial was unreasonable and attributable to the state Significant delay (18.5 months) unreasonable Some delay due to reasonable factors (hung jury, scheduling, witness unavailability) Only pre-trial delay matters; court did not err in denying dismissal under 135.747.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Garner, 253 Or App 64 (2012) (pre-trial timing; mistrial not within 135.747; applies to first-trial delay as interpreted in Garner)
  • Bevel v. Gladden, 232 Or 578 (1962) (waiver of statutory speedy-trial rights by failure to file before trial)
  • State v. Emery, 318 Or 460 (1994) (purpose of ORS 135.747 to prevent languishing cases, not prejudice protection)
  • State v. Gardner, 233 Or 252 (1963) (dictum on waiver by failing to raise speedy-trial issue prior to trial)
  • State v. Johnson, 253 Or App 392 (2012) (applies Garner reasoning to a related appellate context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Contreras
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Dec 5, 2012
Citations: 291 P.3d 799; 253 Or. App. 693; 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1449; MI070602; A143758
Docket Number: MI070602; A143758
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In