History
  • No items yet
midpage
929 N.W.2d 245
Wis. Ct. App.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Officer stopped Mose Coffee for impaired driving; observed slurred speech, bloodshot/glazed eyes, and strong odor of intoxicants; Coffee was arrested for OWI and secured in the squad car.
  • Officer Skelton asked arriving officers to search Coffee's vehicle; they found a tote-style bag behind the driver’s seat that was reachable from the front.
  • Inside the bag officers located two mason jars with suspected marijuana flakes, multiple cell phones, many small clear plastic baggies, and other items; additional marijuana and paraphernalia were found in the trunk.
  • Coffee moved to suppress all drug evidence, arguing a search incident to OWI arrest was unreasonable because alcohol (the substance the officer smelled) is typically consumed elsewhere and would not reasonably be expected inside a deep container in the car.
  • The circuit court denied suppression; Coffee pled to OWI (second offense) and possession with intent to deliver and appealed the denial of the suppression motion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a vehicle search incident to an OWI arrest was reasonable when officers searched a bag behind the driver and found drugs Coffee: No reasonable belief evidence of OWI would be in that bag; alcohol is usually consumed elsewhere and would not be expected at the bottom of the bag State: OWI arrest covers impairment by alcohol or drugs; officers reasonably could expect evidence of intoxication (alcohol, drugs, paraphernalia, receipts) in the vehicle and containers Search lawful: when arrested for OWI, officers may search vehicle and containers because evidence relevant to OWI might be found

Key Cases Cited

  • Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009) (search-incident-to-arrest of a vehicle is permitted only when it is reasonable to believe evidence of the offense of arrest might be found in the vehicle)
  • State v. Dearborn, 327 Wis. 2d 252 (2010) (Wisconsin adoption and application of Gant standard)
  • State v. Denk, 315 Wis. 2d 5 (2008) (State bears burden to establish exception to warrant requirement)
  • State v. Reed, 384 Wis. 2d 469 (2018) (constitutional protection against unreasonable searches; context for warrant exceptions)
  • People v. Evans, 200 Cal. App. 4th 735 (2011) (recognizing it is logical to expect alcohol or drug-related items inside an intoxicated driver’s car)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Coffee
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Date Published: Apr 24, 2019
Citations: 929 N.W.2d 245; 2019 WI App 25; 387 Wis. 2d 673; Appeal No. 2018AP1209-CR
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2018AP1209-CR
Court Abbreviation: Wis. Ct. App.
Log In