State v. Carpio
43 A.3d 1
| R.I. | 2012Background
- Carpio murdered a Providence police detective with the officer's own firearm after an earlier assault on an elderly woman and a later escape; he was convicted of first-degree murder, discharging a firearm during a crime of violence, and felony assault with a dangerous weapon.
- Defendant raised an insanity defense based on mental incapacity; multiple experts testified for both sides on criminal responsibility.
- Trial court instructed the jury on Model Penal Code insanity standards and emphasized community standards of blameworthiness in evaluating impairment; jury found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Carpio received life without parole for first-degree murder of a police officer, plus consecutive sentences for the firearm discharge and the elderly-woman assault; the trial judge held he was incorrigible and not rehabilitable.
- On appeal, Carpio challenged the insanity instructions and the sentence; the Court denied the appeal in all respects.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insanity instructions adequacy | Carpio argues the instructions added a second-tier standard. | Carpio contends language about 'community's sense of justice' framed an extra element. | Instructions were proper; no extra element added. |
| Sufficiency of evidence on criminal responsibility | Carpio asserts evidence supports lack of criminal responsibility. | Carpio argues insufficiency of evidence on insanity defense. | Waived; no review of sufficiency on direct appeal under raise-or-waive rule. |
| Sentence for murder of a police officer | State supports life without parole given offense and defendant's history. | Carpio seeks reduction to life with parole, citing rehabilitation and mental illness. | Life without parole affirmed; not reduced. |
| Proper scope of appellate review for insanity questions | N/A | N/A | Rhode Island does not recognize plain-error; raise-or-waive governs. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Johnson, 121 R.I. 254 ((1979)) (adopted Model Penal Code standard for insanity; role of jury as arbiter of responsibility)
- State v. Barrett, 768 A.2d 929 ((2001)) (insanity standard and jury's responsibility depend on community standards)
- State v. Tassone, 749 A.2d 1112 ((2000)) (life without parole review; independent judicial discretion)
- State v. Graham, 941 A.2d 848 ((2008)) (criteria for assessing disproportionate punishment and aggravating factors)
- State v. Lynch, 854 A.2d 1022 ((2004)) (sufficiency issues tied to trial motions and preservation)
