History
  • No items yet
midpage
2019 Ohio 5017
Ohio Ct. App.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Desiree Black pushed Paul Lewis into a lake while he was fishing; his father’s fishing rod and a recently purchased reel went missing.
  • Black later recovered the rod and reel; when Lewis returned he was refused their return and Black and her fiancé loaded the items into their van.
  • Lewis’s father retrieved the rod from Black’s home the next day but Black refused to return the reel; a deputy later recorded conflicting statements from Black about the reel’s whereabouts.
  • Black was charged with disorderly conduct, unauthorized use of property, and petty theft; a jury convicted her of disorderly conduct and petty theft (R.C. 2913.02(A)(1)).
  • The trial court sentenced Black to 30 days in jail, a $250 fine, $110 restitution, and community control; Black appealed, raising (1) insufficiency/manifest-weight of the evidence as to theft and (2) alleged vindictive sentencing for refusing a plea offer.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency and manifest weight of the evidence for petty theft (R.C. 2913.02(A)(1)) Evidence (victim, girlfriend, father, deputy) showed Black knowingly controlled the reel without consent and intended to deprive Black said recovery was incidental, returned the rod to father, left the reel on the dock, and lacked purpose to steal Conviction affirmed: evidence sufficient; jury verdict not against manifest weight
Sentencing: whether court increased sentence as punishment for rejecting plea (vindictiveness) Court relied on trial testimony, Black’s inconsistent statements, and lack of acceptance of responsibility—not on refusal to plead Black contends sentence was harsher because she exercised her right to a jury trial Sentence affirmed: appellant failed to show actual vindictiveness; court properly considered credibility and trial evidence

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (1997) (discusses manifest-weight review and interplay with sufficiency)
  • State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259 (1991) (standard for sufficiency-of-the-evidence review)
  • State v. Otten, 33 Ohio App.3d 339 (9th Dist. 1986) (appellate review for manifest-weight claims)
  • State v. DeHass, 10 Ohio St.2d 230 (1967) (credibility and weight of evidence are for the trier of fact)
  • State v. O'Dell, 45 Ohio St.3d 140 (1989) (sentencing court may consider trial evidence and defendant’s truthfulness)
  • State v. Rahab, 150 Ohio St.3d 152 (2017) (defendant bears burden to prove actual vindictiveness on appeal)
  • United States v. Grayson, 438 U.S. 41 (1978) (trial demeanor and evidence may inform sentencing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Black
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 9, 2019
Citations: 2019 Ohio 5017; 19AP0013
Docket Number: 19AP0013
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Black, 2019 Ohio 5017