State v. Bennett
2014 Ohio 160
Ohio Ct. App.2014Background
- Bennett was charged in three Lorain County cases arising from a shooting at a Kentucky Avenue home and an attempted robbery of a tattoo artist; the three indictments were filed the same day.
- The cases were consolidated for trial over Bennett’s objection, though one case (11CR084144) was severed on the morning of trial due to the victim’s absence.
- A jury tried 11CR084132 and 11CR084219; Bennett was convicted on all counts in 11CR084132 and acquitted in 11CR084219.
- The court merged felonious assault with the improperly discharging a firearm at or into a habitation and sentenced Bennett to 26 years.
- On appeal Bennett assigns error to joinder/severance decisions, continuance on one case, manifest weight of the evidence, and various evidentiary issues including a claimed plain error involving Fifth Amendment rights.
- The appellate court overrules Bennett’s assignments and affirms the judgment.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether joinder/consolidation was proper | Bennett contends consolidation was improper | State argues joinder is favored and efficient | Joinder permitted; no reversible error (forfeiture/plain error not shown) |
| Whether the post-joinder continuance was proper | Bennett argues continuance prejudiced him | State needed the continuance to proceed with Case 11CR084144 | Continuance not an abuse of discretion; no reversible prejudice |
| Whether severance of case 11CR084144 was proper | Severance was improper and prejudicial | Joinder outweighed prejudice; trial court did not abuse discretion | Severance on day of trial upheld; no reversible prejudice |
| Whether the verdict in 11CR084132 was against the manifest weight of the evidence | Convictions against weight of the evidence | Evidence supported verdict; credibility for jury | Convictions upheld; not against the manifest weight |
| Whether admitting testimony regarding Bennett invoking his right to remain silent was plain error | Testimony violated Fifth Amendment rights | Testimony did not affect trial outcome; no plain error | No plain error; testimony did not prejudice outcome |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Miller, 2012-Ohio-1263 (9th Dist. Lorain Nos. 10CA009922 & 10CA009915, 2012-Ohio-1263) (joinder/severance considerations; renewal of objections required)
- State v. Hatfield, 2008-Ohio-2431 (9th Dist. Summit No. 23716, 2008-Ohio-2431) (joinder and severance guidance)
- State v. Samuels, 2012-Ohio-5401 (9th Dist. Summit Nos. 25982, 25983, & 25984, 2012-Ohio-5401) (prospective efficiency and fairness of joinder)
- State v. Unger, 1981-Ohio-? (Ohio St.2d 1981) (continuance factors and abuse of discretion standard)
- State v. Dawalt, 2007-Ohio-2438 (9th Dist. Medina No. 06CA0059-M, 2007-Ohio-2438) (abuse of discretion review for continuances)
- State v. Leach, 2004-Ohio-2147 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004) (admissibility of post-Miranda/attorney invocation statements; plain error rule)
