History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Bennett
2014 Ohio 160
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Bennett was charged in three Lorain County cases arising from a shooting at a Kentucky Avenue home and an attempted robbery of a tattoo artist; the three indictments were filed the same day.
  • The cases were consolidated for trial over Bennett’s objection, though one case (11CR084144) was severed on the morning of trial due to the victim’s absence.
  • A jury tried 11CR084132 and 11CR084219; Bennett was convicted on all counts in 11CR084132 and acquitted in 11CR084219.
  • The court merged felonious assault with the improperly discharging a firearm at or into a habitation and sentenced Bennett to 26 years.
  • On appeal Bennett assigns error to joinder/severance decisions, continuance on one case, manifest weight of the evidence, and various evidentiary issues including a claimed plain error involving Fifth Amendment rights.
  • The appellate court overrules Bennett’s assignments and affirms the judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether joinder/consolidation was proper Bennett contends consolidation was improper State argues joinder is favored and efficient Joinder permitted; no reversible error (forfeiture/plain error not shown)
Whether the post-joinder continuance was proper Bennett argues continuance prejudiced him State needed the continuance to proceed with Case 11CR084144 Continuance not an abuse of discretion; no reversible prejudice
Whether severance of case 11CR084144 was proper Severance was improper and prejudicial Joinder outweighed prejudice; trial court did not abuse discretion Severance on day of trial upheld; no reversible prejudice
Whether the verdict in 11CR084132 was against the manifest weight of the evidence Convictions against weight of the evidence Evidence supported verdict; credibility for jury Convictions upheld; not against the manifest weight
Whether admitting testimony regarding Bennett invoking his right to remain silent was plain error Testimony violated Fifth Amendment rights Testimony did not affect trial outcome; no plain error No plain error; testimony did not prejudice outcome

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Miller, 2012-Ohio-1263 (9th Dist. Lorain Nos. 10CA009922 & 10CA009915, 2012-Ohio-1263) (joinder/severance considerations; renewal of objections required)
  • State v. Hatfield, 2008-Ohio-2431 (9th Dist. Summit No. 23716, 2008-Ohio-2431) (joinder and severance guidance)
  • State v. Samuels, 2012-Ohio-5401 (9th Dist. Summit Nos. 25982, 25983, & 25984, 2012-Ohio-5401) (prospective efficiency and fairness of joinder)
  • State v. Unger, 1981-Ohio-? (Ohio St.2d 1981) (continuance factors and abuse of discretion standard)
  • State v. Dawalt, 2007-Ohio-2438 (9th Dist. Medina No. 06CA0059-M, 2007-Ohio-2438) (abuse of discretion review for continuances)
  • State v. Leach, 2004-Ohio-2147 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004) (admissibility of post-Miranda/attorney invocation statements; plain error rule)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bennett
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 21, 2014
Citation: 2014 Ohio 160
Docket Number: 12CA010286
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.