State v. Amsden
194 Vt. 128
Vt.2013Background
- In Sept. 2010, police responded to a welfare check under a Brattleboro bridge on a four-year-old child.
- Under the bridge, defendant engaged in an apparent sexual act with a man while her son was nearby.
- Area near the incident was described by officers as littered with trash, glass, urine, and feces.
- The child stood about ten feet from a brook; no barrier existed between child and the brook.
- Defendant’s son was later removed to a cruiser after officers intervened; defendant appeared heavily intoxicated and unsteady.
- Defendant was charged with disorderly conduct and cruelty to a child; convicted on both counts and appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether presence in hospital after arrest supports disorderly-conduct conviction | Amsden’s hospital stay was involuntary; conduct at hospital cannot be disorderly | Conduct at hospital was voluntary and not tumultuous or violent | Affirmed disorderly-conduct conviction |
| Whether conduct inside hospital was violent/tumultuous and reckless | Disorderly conduct requires violent, tumultuous, or reckless risk creation | Hospital environment negates public risk; arrest context limits conduct | Sufficient evidence of violent/tumultuous behavior and recklessness to sustain conviction |
| Whether evidence supported cruelty-to-a-child conviction for endangering health | Environment under the bridge endangered child’s health | Risk was speculative and not enough to endanger health | Evidence supported endangerment; willful exposure/endangerment satisfied mens rea |
| Whether mens rea for 'endanger' was correctly construed | Willful exposure requires knowledge of dangerous conditions | Knowledge not required; mere exposure could suffice | Court held knowledge of danger may be inferred; willfulness satisfied when defendant consciously disregards risk |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Begins, 147 Vt. 45 (Vt. 1986) (disorderly conduct acts during arrest may support conviction)
- State v. Lund, 144 Vt. 171 (Vt. 1984) (violent, tumultuous behavior supports disorderly conduct)
- State v. Read, 165 Vt. 141 (Vt. 1996) (hospital context for disorderly conduct and abusive language limits)
- State v. O’Connell, 147 Vt. 60 (Vt. 1986) (broad view of violent conduct under disorderly conduct statute)
- State v. Brooks, 163 Vt. 245 (Vt. 1995) (recklessness standard; conscious disregard of risk)
- In re Greenough, 116 Vt. 277 (Vt. 1950) (interpretation of mens rea and statute interpretation)
