History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Amsden
194 Vt. 128
Vt.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • In Sept. 2010, police responded to a welfare check under a Brattleboro bridge on a four-year-old child.
  • Under the bridge, defendant engaged in an apparent sexual act with a man while her son was nearby.
  • Area near the incident was described by officers as littered with trash, glass, urine, and feces.
  • The child stood about ten feet from a brook; no barrier existed between child and the brook.
  • Defendant’s son was later removed to a cruiser after officers intervened; defendant appeared heavily intoxicated and unsteady.
  • Defendant was charged with disorderly conduct and cruelty to a child; convicted on both counts and appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether presence in hospital after arrest supports disorderly-conduct conviction Amsden’s hospital stay was involuntary; conduct at hospital cannot be disorderly Conduct at hospital was voluntary and not tumultuous or violent Affirmed disorderly-conduct conviction
Whether conduct inside hospital was violent/tumultuous and reckless Disorderly conduct requires violent, tumultuous, or reckless risk creation Hospital environment negates public risk; arrest context limits conduct Sufficient evidence of violent/tumultuous behavior and recklessness to sustain conviction
Whether evidence supported cruelty-to-a-child conviction for endangering health Environment under the bridge endangered child’s health Risk was speculative and not enough to endanger health Evidence supported endangerment; willful exposure/endangerment satisfied mens rea
Whether mens rea for 'endanger' was correctly construed Willful exposure requires knowledge of dangerous conditions Knowledge not required; mere exposure could suffice Court held knowledge of danger may be inferred; willfulness satisfied when defendant consciously disregards risk

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Begins, 147 Vt. 45 (Vt. 1986) (disorderly conduct acts during arrest may support conviction)
  • State v. Lund, 144 Vt. 171 (Vt. 1984) (violent, tumultuous behavior supports disorderly conduct)
  • State v. Read, 165 Vt. 141 (Vt. 1996) (hospital context for disorderly conduct and abusive language limits)
  • State v. O’Connell, 147 Vt. 60 (Vt. 1986) (broad view of violent conduct under disorderly conduct statute)
  • State v. Brooks, 163 Vt. 245 (Vt. 1995) (recklessness standard; conscious disregard of risk)
  • In re Greenough, 116 Vt. 277 (Vt. 1950) (interpretation of mens rea and statute interpretation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Amsden
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Jul 12, 2013
Citation: 194 Vt. 128
Docket Number: 2012-128
Court Abbreviation: Vt.