State of Tennessee v. Timothy Reynolds
M2016-02181-CCA-R3-CD
| Tenn. Crim. App. | Jul 19, 2017Background
- Timothy Reynolds pleaded guilty to sale of < .5 grams of cocaine (Class C felony) and received a six-year sentence with one year incarcerated and the remainder suspended to supervised probation.
- Reynolds had two prior probation revocations: first (July 2015) for alleged robbery and unpaid fees resulting in 75 days jail and reinstatement; second (Nov.–Dec. 2015) for vandalism/public intoxication and fees, revoked but immediately reinstated.
- Reynolds reported to probation sporadically through March 2016, then stopped reporting; a May 2016 violation alleged failure to report, failure to provide proof of employment, and failure to pay supervision fees and costs.
- At the revocation hearing Reynolds testified he moved to Nashville for work, tried to contact the probation office (received recordings), visited the courthouse, spoke with a probation officer in Nashville, and later turned himself in when he learned he had absconded.
- The trial court found Reynolds failed to prove employment or payments, had not reported since March, and owed fees; the court revoked probation completely and ordered him to serve the balance of his sentence.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether trial court abused discretion by revoking probation | State: revocation proper because defendant violated reporting and payment conditions | Reynolds: communication difficulties with probation office prevented reporting; revocation was excessive | Court: no abuse of discretion; substantial evidence supported revocation |
Key Cases Cited
- Harkins v. State, 811 S.W.2d 79 (Tenn. 1991) (probation revocation reviewed for abuse of discretion)
- Leach v. State, 914 S.W.2d 104 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995) (standard for probation revocation review)
- Pollard v. State, 432 S.W.3d 851 (Tenn. 2013) (presumption of reasonableness applies to sentencing decisions)
- Delp v. State, 614 S.W.2d 395 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1980) (revocation requires substantial evidence of violation)
- Shaffer v. State, 45 S.W.3d 553 (Tenn. 2001) (abuse-of-discretion standard in probation revocation)
- Carver v. State, 570 S.W.2d 872 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1978) (trial judge determines witness credibility in revocation hearings)
- Bledsoe v. State, 387 S.W.2d 811 (Tenn. 1965) (credibility determinations are for the trial court)
