State of Tennessee v. Lorenzo Romell Brown
M2024-01042-CCA-R3-CD
| Tenn. Crim. App. | Jun 26, 2025Background
- Lorenzo Romell Brown was convicted by a jury in Warren County, Tennessee, for attempted voluntary manslaughter, two counts of aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, stemming from the 2019 shooting of Jesse Palmer.
- The altercation took place at West Riverside Apartment Complex in McMinnville; Brown shot Palmer after a physical and verbal confrontation.
- The State’s evidence included eyewitness testimony, physical evidence from the scene, and Brown’s own admission of shooting Palmer. Brown argued partial merger of charges, improper venue, and sentencing error.
- The trial court sentenced Brown to a total of 20 years, imposing 6 years for attempted voluntary manslaughter, 8 years for each aggravated assault, and 12 years consecutive for the firearm charge.
- On appeal, Brown asserted (1) improper venue, (2) merger required for the two aggravated assaults, and (3) error in imposing consecutive sentences for the firearm conviction.
- The appellate court affirmed convictions but remanded for a new sentencing hearing and merger of the aggravated assault counts due to double jeopardy and sentencing errors.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Venue | State argued venue was proven and defense waived issue. | Brown claimed venue was not proven in Warren County. | Venue challenge was waived; venue was proven by preponderance of evidence. |
| Consecutive Sentencing for Firearm | State claimed sentencing was proper or at least record supported discretionary consecutive sentences. | Brown argued consecutive sentencing was imposed due to legal error. | Trial court erred; new sentencing hearing required. |
| Merger of Aggravated Assaults | State conceded merger was required. | Brown argued charges arose from single event. | Counts two and three must merge into single conviction. |
| Double Jeopardy | State agreed merger avoids double jeopardy. | Brown claimed dual convictions violate protections. | Court agreed; dual punishment for same conduct not allowed. |
Key Cases Cited
- Ellis v. Carlton, 986 S.W.2d 600 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998) (party bears burden to prove venue by a preponderance; slight uncontradicted evidence suffices)
- State v. Hutcherson, 790 S.W.2d 532 (Tenn. 1990) (failure to prove venue is trial error, not jurisdictional, and requires remand for retrial, not dismissal)
- State v. Berry, 503 S.W.3d 360 (Tenn. 2015) (convictions must merge where double jeopardy concerns arise from single criminal episode)
- State v. Watkins, 362 S.W.3d 530 (Tenn. 2012) (double jeopardy and merger of convictions analyzed via unit-of-prosecution and multiple description frameworks)
- State v. Pollard, 432 S.W.3d 851 (Tenn. 2013) (appellate review of trial court’s consecutive sentencing decisions)
