STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DARIEN D. ANDERSON(14-12-2063, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
A-0821-15T1
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | Nov 2, 2017Background
- Police in Asbury Park patrolled a high-crime apartment complex after reports of trespass, gang activity, narcotics, and gun incidents; managers requested officers to watch for trespassers during events that day.
- Sergeant Pettway in an unmarked car observed defendant wearing a hooded sweatshirt (hood tight) and an additional zipped vest jacket on a warm day.
- Pettway asked to speak with defendant; defendant looked back, grabbed the front waist area of his pants, and ran.
- Officers pursued; defendant ran out of sight around a building, later reappeared running with his hands free, fell, and was apprehended; he said he fled because of outstanding warrants.
- Pettway retraced the route and found a loaded revolver partially covered by a bandana near bushes by the building defendant had run past.
- Defendant pled guilty after the trial court denied his suppression motion; he was sentenced under the Graves Act mandatory parole-ineligibility term. On appeal, he challenged the suppression ruling and raised sentencing-credit and Graves Act waiver issues.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether officers had reasonable suspicion to justify an investigatory stop (Terry stop) after defendant ran | Flight combined with defendant s grabbing his waistband, heavy clothing on warm day, and disappearance from view provided reasonable suspicion to stop and investigate | Flight alone insufficient; seizure of gun unlawful because police lacked reasonable suspicion to pursue and search the area | Denied suppression: totality of circumstances (clothing, waistband grab, flight and later hands-free) gave reasonable and articulable suspicion to justify the investigatory stop and seizure |
| Whether the trial court should have considered a Graves Act waiver at sentencing | State: no obligation to raise waiver sua sponte; sentencing court's omission not preserved on appeal | Defendant: court failed to consider/grant a Graves Act (N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6.2) waiver reducing parole ineligibility | Court declined to consider on appeal because defendant did not request waiver at sentencing; remanded to allow a motion to correct an illegal sentence under Rule 3:21-10(b)(5) |
| Whether defendant was entitled to jail-time (gap-time) credits for county jail time served on a municipal sentence | State disputed nature/timing of municipal sentence and credits; factual record insufficient | Defendant claimed he served municipal jail time in county jail and thus is entitled to credits against his state sentence | Trial court erred as a matter of law to deny credits solely because time was in county jail; remanded for factfinding on the antecedent municipal sentence and credit calculation |
| Standard of review for suppression factual findings | State: defer to trial court's credibility and factfinding | Defendant: trial court erred in applying law to facts | Appellate court affords deference to trial court's factual findings supported by record; reviews legal conclusions de novo and affirmed suppression denial |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Robinson, 200 N.J. 1 (discussing appellate deference to trial court factfinding)
- State v. Gonzales, 227 N.J. 77 (standard for reviewing suppression fact findings)
- State v. Johnson, 42 N.J. 146 (trial judge s opportunity to observe witnesses informs deference)
- State v. S.S., 229 N.J. 360 (affirming deference to trial court factfinding in suppression matters)
- State v. Watts, 223 N.J. 503 (appellate review of legal conclusions is de novo)
- State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 (investigatory stop may occur when pursuit communicates a restraint on freedom)
- State v. Williams, 410 N.J. Super. 549 (stop valid if specific, articulable facts create reasonable suspicion)
- State v. Pineiro, 181 N.J. 13 (flight combined with other factors can supply reasonable suspicion)
- State v. Arthur, 149 N.J. 1 (weight to officer s experience and reasonable inferences)
- State v. Dangerfield, 171 N.J. 446 (flight alone does not create reasonable suspicion)
- State v. Walters, 445 N.J. Super. 596 (gap-time credits can apply when municipal sentence served in county jail)
- Buncie v. Dep't of Corr., 382 N.J. Super. 214 (jail-time credits for time spent in county jail prior to trial and sentencing)
