History
  • No items yet
midpage
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DWAYNE S. JOHNSON(13-07-1643, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
A-2758-14T3
N.J. Super. App. Div. U
May 30, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Dwayne S. Johnson was indicted for first‑degree murder, first‑degree robbery (later reduced at trial to third‑degree theft-from-a-person), and felony murder after Terrance Everett died following a street assault captured on a 73‑second cell‑phone video.
  • Eyewitnesses and security footage placed Everett alive and walking before the altercation; the cell‑phone video shows defendant repeatedly kicking and stomping Everett's head while Everett lay face‑down and motionless.
  • Forensic pathologist Dr. Leanne Cronin testified that blunt‑force trauma to the head caused a fatal concussion and that the video and postmortem findings supported that Everett was alive during the beating.
  • Defense expert Dr. Zhongxue Hua disputed that blunt‑force trauma caused the death and suggested cardiac arrest from acute PCP intoxication and severe heart disease could have been causal; neuropathology report by Dr. Thoma (stipulated) found no gross brain pathology.
  • Trial court admitted the video (muted), denied motions to dismiss the indictment and for acquittal, instructed the jury on circumstantial evidence, and sentenced defendant to 50 years (with NERA 85% parole ineligibility) on murder plus a consecutive 4‑year term on theft.
  • On appeal, defendant challenged (1) admission of the video (relevance/prejudice), (2) sufficiency of proof of cause of death, (3) grand jury indictment dismissal for alleged withheld exculpatory evidence, (4) circumstantial evidence jury charge, and (5) sentencing (aggravating factor and consecutive sentence); a pro se claim of ineffective assistance was deferred.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (State) Defendant's Argument Held
Admissibility of cell‑phone video (N.J.R.E. 402/403) Video is probative of defendant's state of mind and of blunt‑force trauma causing death; relevant and not unduly prejudicial Video irrelevant to cause of death because no credible proof victim was alive during recording; repeated play was unduly prejudicial Admitted: probative on causation and intent; not so inflammatory to outweigh probative value; muting ordered
Sufficiency of evidence re: cause of death / expert certainty Dr. Cronin's opinion + eyewitnesses + video permit rational jury to find blunt‑force fatal concussion Dr. Cronin failed to state opinion "within a reasonable degree of medical certainty"; causation speculative Denied acquittal: viewing state evidence favorably, a reasonable jury could find guilt beyond reasonable doubt; exact phrase unnecessary
Motion to dismiss indictment for withholding exculpatory evidence (grand jury) No clearly exculpatory evidence existed then; State had no actual knowledge of claimed exculpatory proof Prosecutor withheld neuropathology report and evidence of PCP‑induced cardiac arrest, amounting to a "half truth" Denied: dismissal is draconian; no clearly exculpatory evidence presented to grand jury and no proof State knew of such evidence
Sentencing — aggravating factor (a)(2) and consecutive sentence (Yarbough) Brutality and victim's incapacity supported aggravating factor; theft and murder were distinct objectives supporting consecutive terms Aggravating factor improperly applied and double‑counts death; consecutive sentence not justified Affirmed: competent record supports (a)(2) without impermissible double‑counting; Yarbough factors qualitatively support consecutive sentence

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Buckley, 216 N.J. 249 (describing relevance/probative value standard for admissibility)
  • State v. Reyes, 50 N.J. 454 (standard for reviewing denial of motion for judgment of acquittal)
  • State v. Kromphold, 162 N.J. 345 (discussion of aggravating factor N.J.S.A. 2C:44‑1(a)(2) and assessment of totality of harm)
  • State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627 (factors for imposing consecutive versus concurrent sentences)
  • State v. Fuentes, 217 N.J. 57 (standards for reviewing sentencing for abuse of discretion)
  • State v. Hogan, 144 N.J. 216 (when prosecutor must present exculpatory evidence to grand jury)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DWAYNE S. JOHNSON(13-07-1643, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division - Unpublished
Date Published: May 30, 2017
Docket Number: A-2758-14T3
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. App. Div. U