State of New Jersey v. Michael Richard Powers
150 A.3d 951
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 2016Background
- Defendant Michael R. Powers was charged in municipal court with obstruction under N.J.S.A. 2C:29-1(a) after a state trooper attempted to issue a parking summons at a New Jersey Turnpike rest stop.
- Trooper found two vehicles parked in a no-parking area, obtained their plate information, and encountered defendant as he exited the rest stop building.
- Trooper instructed defendant to get into his vehicle and to stop putting his hands in and out of his pockets; defendant refused both instructions.
- The trooper grabbed defendant’s wrist after repeated noncompliance; defendant called 9-1-1, asserting the trooper had assaulted him and recited the trooper’s patrol number, prompting the trooper to call for backup.
- Defendant identified himself as an attorney, said he was waiting for direction from someone on the phone, and refused the trooper’s commands; another trooper arrived and defendant was arrested.
- On Law Division de novo review, judge found obstruction by both “physical interference” and by an “independently unlawful act” (relying on N.J.S.A. 39:4-57); appellate court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further findings.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether evidence supports obstruction conviction by "physical interference" | Defendant’s refusal to follow orders (standing outside car, hands in pockets) physically interfered with trooper’s ability to issue summons and protect safety | Refusal was nonviolent and did not physically block or obstruct trooper’s performance of issuing a ticket | Remanded for clearer findings — record lacks specificity to show how defendant’s conduct physically interfered with trooper’s duties |
| Whether defendant committed an "independently unlawful act" under N.J.S.A. 39:4-57 | Trooper was enforcing a traffic statute when issuing the parking summons; defendant, as a driver, was obligated to follow officer directions | Defendant was not a “driver” at the time (he was outside the vehicle); statute inapplicable to parking citation enforcement | Rejected: N.J.S.A. 39:4-57 did not apply because defendant was not a driver and the trooper was not enforcing a Chapter 39 provision; cannot support independently unlawful-act theory |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Johnson, 42 N.J. 146 (1964) (standard for de novo Law Division review of municipal convictions)
- State v. Clarksburg Inn, 375 N.J. Super. 624 (App. Div. 2005) (standard for reviewing sufficiency of evidence on municipal appeal)
- State v. Handy, 206 N.J. 39 (2011) (appellate deference: facts vs. legal conclusions)
- State v. Churchdale Leasing, 115 N.J. 83 (1989) (criminal statutes construed strictly)
- State v. Rone, 410 N.J. Super. 589 (App. Div. 2009) (obstruction upheld where defendant parked between vehicles and stood between them)
- State v. Perlstein, 206 N.J. Super. 246 (App. Div. 1985) (obstruction upheld where defendant attempted to move car contrary to officer directions)
- State v. Camillo, 382 N.J. Super. 113 (App. Div. 2005) (refusal to provide information may impede report but without physical interference does not support obstruction)
- State v. Wright, 107 N.J. 488 (1987) (distinguishing "operator" or "driver" based on physical control of vehicle)
- State v. Mulcahy, 107 N.J. 467 (1987) (operation shown by intent to drive and physical acts toward operating vehicle)
