History
  • No items yet
midpage
81 A.3d 680
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Dec 16, 2010, Adkins in a one-car crash; police had probable cause to believe intoxication.
  • Adkins arrested for DWI after failing roadside tests; Miranda rights read; counsel invoked at police HQ.
  • Defendant transported to hospital; blood drawn at 4:16 a.m. with certificate signed post-draw.
  • NJ law at the time allowed warrantless blood draws with probable cause; Schmerber framework cited.
  • Subsequent McNeely (2013) restricted per se exigency; Davis retroactivity discussed; state statute and policy guidance referenced.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Retroactivity of McNeely to exclude evidence State argues retroactive rule should not bar admissibility Adkins argues retroactive suppression required under new rule Exclusionary rule not required; blood evidence admitted
Application of good-faith/Novembrino after McNeely State relies on settled precedent; no bad faith Novembrino bars good-faith exception under state constitution No comprehensive good-faith exception; narrow retroactivity approach applied
Scope of deterrence vs. retroactive disruption Exclusion would deter only future, not present misconduct Retroactivity more disruptive; preservation of precedent favored Retroactivity balanced; not suppressing the blood evidence

Key Cases Cited

  • Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (Sup. Ct. 1966) (exigency for blood draw; no per se rule of warrantless seizure)
  • State v. Dyal, 97 N.J. 229 (1984) (probable cause supports blood draw; no federal right to refuse)
  • State v. Ravotto, 169 N.J. 227 (2001) (no warrant needed; exigency due to dissipating BAC; police actions not per se unlawful)
  • Davis v. United States, U.S. , 131 S. Ct. 2419 (2011) (retroactivity of new rules; good-faith not required by all contexts)
  • Missouri v. McNeely, 133 S. Ct. 1552 (2013) (new case-by-case exigency rule; shifts in scrutiny of warrantless blood draws)
  • State v. Novembrino, 105 N.J. 95 (1987) (rejects Le on good-faith exception under state constitution)
  • State v. Harris, 211 N.J. 566 (2012) (limits on applying exclusion when no police misconduct; special circumstances)
  • State v. Earls, 214 N.J. 564 (2013) (retroactivity considerations for novel rulings under NJ Constitution)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State of New Jersey v. Timothy Adkins
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Dec 20, 2013
Citations: 81 A.3d 680; 433 N.J. Super. 479; A-5748-12T4 A-5749-12T4
Docket Number: A-5748-12T4 A-5749-12T4
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
Log In