History
  • No items yet
midpage
150 A.3d 810
Me.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • At ~1:00 a.m. an officer observed a car pull into a closed drug‑store parking lot, park, and turn off its lights; the officer returned to investigate.
  • The officer circled the building, saw nothing unusual behind it, then shone a spotlight on the parked car and observed Gerry reclined in the driver’s seat.
  • The officer asked Gerry if he was all right and what he was doing; the officer smelled alcohol on Gerry during that brief contact.
  • The officer subsequently investigated Gerry for operating under the influence; Gerry was charged under 29‑A M.R.S. § 2411 and moved to suppress evidence arguing the stop was an unlawful seizure.
  • The trial court denied the motion to suppress, finding reasonable, articulable suspicion based on the car’s presence and manner of parking at night; Gerry entered a conditional guilty plea and appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (State) Defendant's Argument (Gerry) Held
Whether the officer’s encounter constituted a permissible seizure supported by reasonable, articulable suspicion Officer had reasonable suspicion of burglary or other wrongdoing from a vehicle parked at a closed business at 1 a.m., justifying brief detention and inquiry Any suspicion of burglary evaporated once no burglary was found; continued detention was an unreasonable seizure Court held brief detention was supported by reasonable, articulable suspicion; subsequent discovery of alcohol was lawful and justified further investigation

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Gulick, 759 A.2d 1085 (Me. 2000) (officer may investigate vehicle at closed facility at night to check for medical emergency or wrongdoing)
  • State v. Hill, 606 A.2d 793 (Me. 1992) (minimal further inquiries incident to an investigative stop need not be supported by new suspicion if initial stop was justified)
  • Rodriguez v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 1609 (2015) (a stop may become unlawful if prolonged beyond the time reasonably required to complete its mission)
  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (officer may conduct brief investigatory stop on specific and articulable facts)
  • State v. Dulac, 600 A.2d 1121 (Me. 1992) (articulable suspicion standard for investigatory detentions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State of Maine v. Adam D. Gerry
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Nov 8, 2016
Citations: 150 A.3d 810; 2016 ME 163; 2016 Me. LEXIS 182; Docket: Wal-16-17
Docket Number: Docket: Wal-16-17
Court Abbreviation: Me.
Log In