History
  • No items yet
midpage
State of Iowa v. Jessie Jarell Marshall
16-1729
| Iowa Ct. App. | May 3, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Jessie Marshall pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance (marijuana), third offense, in Woodbury County, Iowa.
  • Marshall signed a written "Waiver of Rights and Guilty Plea" that included a handwritten line waiving presence at sentencing and allocution.
  • Marshall did not file a motion in arrest of judgment challenging his guilty plea procedures after sentencing.
  • On appeal he argued (1) the district court failed to inform him of the mandatory minimum 48-hour incarceration as required by Iowa R. Crim. P. 2.8(2)(b)(2), and (2) his written waiver of allocution was insufficiently informed/knowing.
  • The district court accepted the plea and sentenced; the Court of Appeals reviewed plea-preservation rules and waiver doctrine.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Marshall preserved a challenge that the court failed to inform him of the mandatory minimum sentence State: Marshall failed to preserve the claim because he did not file a motion in arrest of judgment and his written plea warned that failure to file would preclude appellate review Marshall: Court did not inform him of the mandatory 48-hour minimum in violation of rule 2.8(2)(b)(2), so plea is infirm Not preserved — affirmed. Written plea informed him of motion-in-arrest requirement; no motion filed
Whether Marshall knowingly and intentionally waived his right of allocution via the written plea State: The written waiver (including handwritten language) adequately waived presence at sentencing and allocution Marshall: The handwritten notation did not explain allocution’s meaning, so waiver was not knowing and unambiguous Waiver valid — affirmed. Express written waiver of presence at sentencing and allocution was sufficient

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Fisher, 877 N.W.2d 676 (Iowa 2016) (written waiver can satisfy motion-in-arrest-of-judgment notice requirement)
  • State v. Meron, 675 N.W.2d 537 (Iowa 2004) (defendant must file motion in arrest of judgment to preserve guilty-plea challenges)
  • State v. Barnes, 652 N.W.2d 466 (Iowa 2002) (written plea provisions can preclude appellate challenges if a motion in arrest is not filed)
  • State v. Craig, 562 N.W.2d 633 (Iowa 1997) (standard of review for sentencing procedures — abuse of discretion)
  • State v. Jones, 817 N.W.2d 11 (Iowa 2012) (allocution is waivable)
  • State v. Lumadue, 622 N.W.2d 302 (Iowa 2001) (waiver must be knowing and intentional)
  • State v. Seager, 571 N.W.2d 204 (Iowa 1997) (waiver defined as intentional relinquishment of a known right)
  • State v. Fountain, 786 N.W.2d 260 (Iowa 2010) (ineffective-assistance claims are exception to preservation rules)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State of Iowa v. Jessie Jarell Marshall
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Iowa
Date Published: May 3, 2017
Docket Number: 16-1729
Court Abbreviation: Iowa Ct. App.