History
  • No items yet
midpage
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.
30 N.E.3d 440
Ill. App. Ct.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Andrew Toig, an unmarried, unemancipated college student living in a campus apartment in Colorado, was injured in an auto accident; he sought UIM coverage under three State Farm auto policies held by his father and stepmother and one Progressive policy held by his mother.
  • State Farm policies defined “Relative” in two sentences: (1) a person related by blood/marriage/adoption who "resides primarily with you," and (2) "It includes your unmarried and unemancipated child away at school."
  • Parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment; facts were undisputed and the sole contested legal question was whether Andrew qualified as a “relative” under State Farm’s policies.
  • Trial court held the two-sentence definition is disjunctive: the second sentence independently covers an unmarried, unemancipated child away at school, so Andrew was covered; total recoverable UIM was $500,000 minus $40,000 tortfeasor payment = $460,000, apportioned equally among the four policies ($115,000 each).
  • State Farm raised additional arguments (stepchild exclusion, per-policy setoffs, pro rata allocation by limits) for the first time on rehearing; the trial court declined to reverse and the appellate court found those arguments forfeited.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether both sentences of "Relative" must be satisfied (i.e., conjunctive interpretation) Both lines are required; Andrew did not "reside primarily" with the insureds, so no coverage The second sentence is an independent, alternative definition covering a child away at school Held for Progressive: sentences read disjunctively; a child away at school is covered without proving "primarily resides"
Whether Andrew qualified as an "unmarried and unemancipated child away at school" given voter registration and driver license in Colorado Registration/license show intent not to return => not "away" from parents => no coverage "Away" means absent from parents' home; voter registration/license do not negate "away at school" under the policy Held for Progressive: Andrew was "away at school" and covered; voter registration/driver's license do not defeat coverage absent policy language
Whether State Farm waived/forfeited arguments raised first in motion for rehearing (stepchild exclusion; per-policy setoffs; prorata by limits) These are meritorious late-raised arguments and the court should consider them Progressive: issues were pleaded/argued earlier; State Farm forfeited by failing to raise them in original briefing Held for Progressive: trial court did not abuse discretion denying reconsideration; late theories forfeited
Allocation / setoff of recovery among policies (whether $40,000 setoff applies to total or each policy; equal share vs prorata by limits) (Partially raised late) Argues $40,000 should be subtracted from each policy and allocation should be prorated by limits Progressive argued $40,000 is subtracted from the combined total and each policy shares equally (25%) Held for Progressive: $40,000 subtracted from combined $500,000 (leaving $460,000) and each of four policies shares equally ($115,000 each)

Key Cases Cited

  • Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 154 Ill. 2d 90 (Ill. 1992) (standard of review for summary judgment and rules for construing insurance policies)
  • Founders Ins. Co. v. Munoz, 237 Ill. 2d 424 (Ill. 2010) (give undefined policy terms their plain, ordinary meaning and avoid superfluity)
  • Crump v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 961 F.2d 725 (8th Cir. 1992) (treats the second sentence as an independent source of coverage for children away at school)
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Taussig, 227 Ill. App. 3d 913 (Ill. App. Ct. 1992) (analyzes the two lines as alternate sources of coverage)
  • Drake v. Snider, 608 S.E.2d 191 (W. Va. 2004) (interprets “school” broadly to include boarding/high school and supports coverage for children away at school)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: May 22, 2015
Citation: 30 N.E.3d 440
Docket Number: 1-14-0447
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.