State ex rel. Striker v. Smith
129 Ohio St. 3d 168
| Ohio | 2011Background
- Striker sought access to specific public records from the Shepherd case held by the Mansfield Municipal Court clerk.
- Clerk stated records were in Judge Payton's custody and would not be public until returned to the clerk's office.
- Striker petitioned the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus and for statutory damages and attorney fees.
- The clerk later provided three of the four requested records; the remaining record was disputed as nonexistent or not public.
- The court of appeals denied mandamus and damages; on review, the supreme court affirmed, holding the clerk was not obligated to produce nonexistent records and the MOOTness of part of the claim affected damages.
- Pre-Supreme Court Rules: Sup.R. 44–47 applicability was not retroactive to Striker’s 2006 request, but the core public-records issue remained governed by R.C. 149.43.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether mandamus is proper to compel access to public records | Striker argues clerk must disclose public Shepherd records. | Smith contends records were not in clerk's possession and thus not subject to mandamus. | Yes; petition denied as moot regarding most records; applicable to records in clerk's possession. |
| Whether the clerk can be liable for statutory damages and fees when requested records were not in his possession | Striker seeks damages for delays in providing records. | Clerk had no duty for records not in possession; payments inappropriate. | No; damages/fees denied where records were not in clerk’s possession. |
| Whether the court of appeals properly concluded that a disputed 12/20/2006 remand record did not exist | Striker argued a journal entry evidenced the remand exists; thus the record exists. | Clerk showed no remand order and the entry may relate to another record; some records were provided. | Yes; record not established; clerk not obligated to provide nonexistent records. |
Key Cases Cited
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Winkler, 101 Ohio St.3d 382 (2004-Ohio-1581) (court records fall within broad definition of public records)
- State ex rel. WBNS TV, Inc. v. Dues, 101 Ohio St.3d 406 (2004-Ohio-1497) (any record used by a court to render a decision is a public record)
- State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Toledo-Lucas Cty. Port Auth., 121 Ohio St.3d 537 (2009-Ohio-1767) (public-records mandamus moot where records disclosed)
- State ex rel. Lanham v. Smith, 112 Ohio St.3d 527 (2007-Ohio-609) (no duty to provide records not in possession)
- State ex rel. Mahajan v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio, 127 Ohio St.3d 497 (2010-Ohio-5995) (deny statutory damages when claims lack merit)
- State v. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, 108 Ohio St.3d 288 (2006-Ohio-903) (mandamus appropriate to enforce public records act)
