History
  • No items yet
midpage
2024 Ohio 770
Ohio
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Thomas Clark, an inmate at Lebanon Correctional Institution, submitted a public-records request for paper copies of commissary price lists via the prison’s electronic "kite" system in September 2022.
  • Prison staff initially responded by referring Clark to electronic versions and failed to provide paper copies despite his repeated requests and grievance filings.
  • Inspector Hoover granted Clark’s grievance but still did not provide paper copies; Clark appealed to the chief inspector, who denied the appeal due to the grievance being technically granted.
  • Clark did not receive paper copies until April 2023, after he filed a mandamus action in the Supreme Court of Ohio seeking the records, statutory damages, and court costs.
  • The Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) delivered paper copies, albeit outdated, after the mandamus was filed.
  • At issue was whether the ODRC's delay and subsequent delivery affected Clark's entitlement to the writ, statutory damages, and costs.

Issues

Issue Clark's Argument ODRC's Argument Held
Whether writ of mandamus should issue ODRC failed to timely provide requested records Writ moot as records ultimately provided Denied as moot
Entitlement to statutory damages under Public Records Act ODRC delayed, violating law; damages are due No damages due: records aren’t public, improper recipient, etc. $1,000 statutory damages
Whether court costs are warranted Court should award costs as relief was warranted No right to costs since writ denied or no bad faith Denied
Nature of request (records vs. information) Requested specific paper copies of lists Request was for information, not actual records Requested records, not info

Key Cases Cited

  • State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Sage, 142 Ohio St.3d 392 (Ohio 2015) (standard for writ of mandamus under Ohio Public Records Act)
  • State ex rel. Morgan v. New Lexington, 112 Ohio St.3d 33 (Ohio 2006) (differentiating requests for information vs. actual records)
  • State ex rel. Ware v. Parikh, 172 Ohio St.3d 49 (Ohio 2023) (clarifying statutory damages limits for multiple related requests)
  • State ex rel. Griffin v. Sehlmeyer, 165 Ohio St.3d 315 (Ohio 2021) (electronic communications as public records requests)
  • State ex rel. Dehler v. Kelly, 127 Ohio St.3d 309 (Ohio 2010) (no stacking of damages for single records request)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Clark v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 6, 2024
Citations: 2024 Ohio 770; 174 Ohio St. 3d 218; 235 N.E.3d 445; 2023-0387
Docket Number: 2023-0387
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In
    State ex rel. Clark v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2024 Ohio 770