History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Cinergy Corp./Duke Energy v. Heber
130 Ohio St. 3d 194
| Ohio | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Heber, a longtime Cinergy/Duke Energy employee, was injured in 1970 and retired 19 years later, in 1989.
  • In 2008 Heber applied for permanent total disability (PTD) benefits under the Industrial Commission of Ohio.
  • The staff hearing officer did not expressly decide on whether Heber’s retirement was voluntary or involuntary, focusing instead on medical evidence of disability.
  • Cinergy sought mandamus to require the Commission to address the voluntariness of retirement before determining PTD eligibility.
  • The Court of Appeals vacated the order and remanded to reconsider, prompting Supreme Court review.
  • Ohio law holds that a retirement initiated for reasons unrelated to the industrial injury is voluntary and can preclude PTD benefits.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was Heber’s retirement voluntary for PTD purposes? Heber contends retirement was injury-related and involuntary. Cinergy contends retirement may be voluntary and not prohibited if connected to injury. Voluntariness must be determined; retirement may preclude PTD if voluntary.
Integrity of the PTD determination without a voluntariness ruling The Commission failed to rule on voluntariness, prejudicing PTD analysis. Medical evidence of disability suffices for PTD without explicit voluntariness findings. Remand is appropriate to consider voluntariness before PTD decision.
What evidence can prove injury-induced retirement besides contemporaneous medical records? Contemporaneous medical evidence is necessary to link retirement to injury. Other evidence can substantiate the connection between injury and retirement. Other evidence may establish injury-retirement link; lack of contemporaneous medical evidence is not determinative.

Key Cases Cited

  • State ex rel. Rockwell Internatl. v. Indus. Comm., 40 Ohio St.3d 44 (1988) (retirement for non-injury reasons is voluntary)
  • State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 69 Ohio St.3d 202 (1994) (voluntary retirement precludes PTD benefits)
  • State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc., 31 Ohio St.3d 18 (1987) (commission weighs evidence and credibility; can infer voluntariness)
  • State ex rel. Lawson v. Mondie Forge, 104 Ohio St.3d 39 (2004) (inference about retirement voluntariness permissible; credibility weighed by commission)
  • State ex rel. Lackey v. Indus. Comm., 129 Ohio St.3d 119 (2011) (lack of contemporaneous medical evidence can be offset by other proof)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Cinergy Corp./Duke Energy v. Heber
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 4, 2011
Citation: 130 Ohio St. 3d 194
Docket Number: 2010-1535
Court Abbreviation: Ohio