History
  • No items yet
midpage
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. City of Waukegan
2017 IL App (2d) 160381
| Ill. App. Ct. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Juan Rivera was arrested in 1992, confessed after prolonged interrogation, convicted (1993), retried and convicted (1998), retried and convicted again (2009), and finally exonerated and released in 2012; he later sued the City and officers under §1983 and state tort law for wrongful conviction and related conduct.
  • Rivera’s complaints alleged coerced/false confession (Fifth Amendment), Brady violations (suppression/destruction of exculpatory evidence), malicious prosecution, conspiracy, failure to intervene, and related state-law claims; his third amended complaint incorporated many prior allegations.
  • The City tendered defense/indemnity to its insurers (St. Paul and Travelers); the insurers filed a declaratory-judgment action asserting no duty to defend or indemnify because the insurers’ 2008–09 LEL policies only cover injuries that "happen while this agreement is in effect."
  • The parties and trial court focused on the coverage “trigger” question: whether Rivera’s alleged injuries occurred (or were caused) during the 2008–09 policy period (the City contended certain wrongful acts occurred at the 2009 trial; insurers argued the wrongful acts occurred years earlier).
  • The trial court followed this court’s prior reasoning in Indian Harbor (and City of Zion) that Rivera’s claims presented a single cause/occurrence predating the 2008–09 policies, granted summary judgment for the insurers, and the City appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Insurers) Defendant's Argument (City) Held
Trigger: Did Rivera’s lawsuit trigger coverage under 2008–09 policies? Triggering wrongful acts occurred before 2008–09; no coverage Wrongful acts (use of confession, Brady violations, conspiracy, failure to intervene) caused injury during 2009 trial/policy period Held for insurers: single occurrence predated policies; no trigger for 2008–09 policies
Are Fifth Amendment and Brady claims separate, discrete triggers? They are continuations of same injury (malicious-prosecution type); not separate triggers Fifth Amendment use at 2009 trial and Brady-related failures at retrial are discrete occurrences within policy period Court rejected multiple-trigger theory; claims treated like malicious prosecution — not separate triggers
Does witness/prosecutorial action at trial create liability triggering coverage? Liability depends on police wrongful acts (occurred earlier); witness immunity shields testimony, so trial testimony alone cannot create coverage Use of confession at 2009 trial caused a Fifth Amendment injury during policy period, so coverage triggered Court: testimony is subject to absolute witness immunity; insurer not bound by acts (testimony) that are not actionable — wrongful acts occurred earlier
Precedent and stare decisis: should court follow Indian Harbor/City of Zion or Westport/McFatridge? Follow Indian Harbor and City of Zion: majority rule rejects multiple-trigger theory Urged following federal district court decisions (Westport) and Seventh Circuit cases allowing other trigger analyses Court adheres to Indian Harbor/City of Zion; declines to follow Westport or McFatridge; affirms prior appellate approach

Key Cases Cited

  • Nicor, Inc. v. Associated Electronics & Gas Ins. Servs., Ltd., 223 Ill. 2d 407 (Ill. 2006) (applies cause-theory analysis to determine single occurrence from continuous conduct)
  • Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (U.S. 1983) (witnesses, including police testimony, receive absolute immunity)
  • Chavez v. Martinez, 538 U.S. 760 (U.S. 2003) (police abuse producing a coerced confession can implicate due process independent of trial use)
  • Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (U.S. 1976) (prosecutors have absolute immunity for actions preparing and presenting cases)
  • Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 154 Ill. 2d 90 (Ill. 1992) (court must compare underlying complaint allegations to policy language to determine whether coverage is triggered)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. City of Waukegan
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Sep 15, 2017
Citation: 2017 IL App (2d) 160381
Docket Number: 2-16-0381
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.