History
  • No items yet
midpage
Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v. Telewizja Polska, S.A.
222 F. Supp. 3d 95
D.D.C.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • SEI (Spanski Enterprises), a Canadian distributor, claimed exclusive U.S. rights to TVP Polonia programming under written agreements with TVP (1994 agreement, 1999 addendum, and a 2009 settlement). SEI registered 51 episodes with the U.S. Copyright Office in early 2012.
  • TVP (Poland’s public broadcaster) hosted VOD content on www.tvp.pl using a system with Workflow, CMS, Portal Engine, and CDN components and employed geoblocking (MaxMind) with a CMS default of "minus ameryki" to block North/South America.
  • Between December 2011 and March 1, 2012, SEI’s representatives viewed and recorded 36 of the later-registered episodes from the U.S.; other witnesses (including a Canadian monitor) also accessed the content.
  • Workflow logs and screenshots showed multiple formats for many episodes (some geoblocked, some not), later deletions of non-geoblocked formats (including sequential deletions of 27 formats on Feb. 25, 2012), and evidence of post-hoc manipulation of workflow entries.
  • The court found SEI’s witnesses credible, found the defense experts’ explanations of a geoblocking malfunction unpersuasive, concluded TVP intentionally and volitionally made the episodes accessible in the U.S., denied TVP’s equitable estoppel defense, and entered judgment for SEI; the court requested supplemental briefing on damages.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Ownership/Registration SEI holds exclusive U.S. rights via written agreements and valid registrations for 51 episodes TVP is original creator but transferred exclusive rights to SEI; no effective challenge Held for SEI: written transfers + registrations establish SEI as exclusive U.S. copyright holder
Infringement (public performance/transmit) Streaming TVP Polonia from www.tvp.pl into U.S. constituted public performance/transmission infringing SEI’s exclusive right Access occurred but defendant suggested geoblocking failure or non-volitional streaming; contested whether transmission was a performance Held for SEI: transmissions were public performances via streaming; episodes were accessible and viewed in U.S., so infringement occurred
Volitional/Willful Conduct TVP employees intentionally created non-geoblocked formats, published them, then deleted non-geoblocked formats once SEI began investigating TVP blamed automated geoblocking errors or database failures (e.g., MaxMind/Mongo replication) and argued lack of volitional conduct Held for SEI: evidence of manual format creation, CMS/workflow controls, selective deletions, and log manipulation shows volitional, willful infringement; speculative system-failure theories rejected
Equitable estoppel N/A (SEI sought relief) TVP argued SEI knew or misled and should be estopped from suing Held for SEI: TVP cannot satisfy estoppel elements because it acted intentionally and thus was not ignorant or disadvantaged by reliance on SEI

Key Cases Cited

  • Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991) (elements of copyright ownership requirement)
  • Stewart v. Abend, 495 U.S. 207 (1990) (copyright owner holds statutory bundle of exclusive rights)
  • American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2498 (2014) (streaming transmissions fall within the Transmit Clause/public performance right)
  • Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 1962 (2014) (plaintiff bears burden and discussion of equitable doctrines in copyright context)
  • Stenograph L.L.C. v. Bossard Associates, Inc., 144 F.3d 96 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (registration certificates are prima facie evidence of a valid copyright)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v. Telewizja Polska, S.A.
Court Name: District Court, District of Columbia
Date Published: Dec 2, 2016
Citation: 222 F. Supp. 3d 95
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2012-0957
Court Abbreviation: D.D.C.