Snipes v. Presbyterian Church (USA)
3:25-cv-00346
| M.D. Tenn. | Jun 30, 2025Background
- Plaintiff Steven L. Snipes alleges civil rights violations, fraudulent transfer, and a § 1981 claim based on his ancestors’ enslaved labor in constructing Denmark Presbyterian Church in 1854.
- Snipes seeks to enjoin the Presbyterian Church (USA) and related entities from transferring or concealing assets tied to the church.
- Plaintiff previously filed several motions for temporary restraining orders (TROs), which were denied; current motions are for preliminary injunction.
- Defendants argue (among other grounds) that the Presbyterian Church (USA) is not a suable legal entity and that plaintiff lacks standing.
- The Court denied the requested injunction, finding Snipes failed to show a strong likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm.
- Case remains referred to a magistrate judge pending further proceedings.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood of Success | Claims for 13th Amendment violation, fraudulent conveyance, and § 1981 for historical injustice and asset concealment | Claims are nonjusticiable political questions, lack standing, and church not a legal entity | No likelihood of success |
| Irreparable Harm | Immediate risk of asset/record concealment absent injunction | No evidence of imminent risk; already under duty to preserve records | No irreparable harm |
| Sufficiency of Evidence | Allegations based on own pleadings | Plaintiff fails to present evidence beyond allegations | Allegations insufficient |
| Need for Injunction | Necessary to preserve evidence and prevent asset transfer | No showing of imminent harm or need beyond normal discovery obligations | Relief denied |
Key Cases Cited
- Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008) (sets modern preliminary injunction standard)
- Bays v. City of Fairborn, 668 F.3d 814 (6th Cir. 2012) (preliminary injunction factors under Sixth Circuit law)
- Overstreet v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cnty. Gov't, 305 F.3d 566 (6th Cir. 2002) (extraordinary nature of injunctions and plaintiff's burden)
