History
  • No items yet
midpage
79 A.3d 876
Vt.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Smith, a nineteen-year-old with developmental disabilities, was found to be a vulnerable adult under 33 V.S.A. § 6933(a).
  • Wright allegedly engaged in unwanted sexual contact with Smith beginning when she was seventeen.
  • Guardianship proceedings granted the parents broad authority over Smith’s care and residence.
  • Plaintiff filed an RFA seeking protective relief; a two-year no-contact order was issued after a full hearing.
  • The trial court concluded Smith was a vulnerable adult and Wright abused and exploited her; the final RFA order was affirmed on appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was Smith a vulnerable adult under statute? Smith’s disability impaired her ability to protect herself. No sufficient link between disability and protective need. Yes; the court’s findings support vulnerable-adult status.
Did Wright abuse or exploit Smith? Wright engaged in inappropriate sexual conduct exploiting Smith’s impairment. He denied any sexual contact and contesting credibility. Yes; findings support both abuse and exploitation.
Were the credibility findings adequate? Trial court spoke to credibility of Smith’s testimony occurring against parents’ wishes. Credibility needed more explicit findings. Credibility determinations within trial court’s province; adequate for affirmance.
Was exploitation proven by a preponderance of the evidence? Evidence showed Wright exploited Smith’s vulnerabilities for sexual gratification. Credibility issues tainted plaintiff’s testimony. Yes; record supports exploitation finding.

Key Cases Cited

  • Farr v. Searles, 180 Vt. 642 (2006 VT 110) (RFA proceedings not require extensive findings; protects vulnerable adults)
  • Raynes v. Rogers, 183 Vt. 513 (2008 VT 52) (RFA orders protect victims and consider credibility determinations by family court)
  • Siegel v. Misch, 182 Vt. 623 (2007 VT 116) (Credibility determinations are the factfinder’s province)
  • Omega Optical, Inc. v. Chroma Tech. Corp., 174 Vt. 10 (2002 VT 10) (Credibility is for the trier of fact; appeals defer to trial court’s credibility assessments)
  • Bull v. Pinkham Eng’g Assocs., 170 Vt. 450 (2000 VT 10) (Contentions not raised at trial are not preserved on appeal)
  • Lay v. Pettengill, 2011 VT 127 (2011 VT 127) (Preservation of challenge to favorable termination element in mal-prosecution context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Wright
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Aug 9, 2013
Citations: 79 A.3d 876; 194 Vt. 326; 2013 Vt. LEXIS 66; 2013 WL 4034226; 2013 VT 68; 2012-431
Docket Number: 2012-431
Court Abbreviation: Vt.
Log In