History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smallwood v. Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance Company
4:23-cv-06197
| D.S.C. | Aug 4, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiffs Tony and Beth Smallwood held an insurance policy with Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance for their mobile home in Conway, SC covering July 2021–July 2022.
  • In May 2022, during an unrelated inspection, damage (sagging subflooring) was discovered linked to humidity and condensation; no evidence of plumbing leaks was found.
  • Plaintiffs filed a claim for the damage, which was denied by Ocean Harbor based on policy exclusions for wear and tear and similar conditions.
  • Plaintiffs obtained an independent inspection, which found water damage from HVAC condensation; Plaintiffs also notified the HVAC installer of alleged defective installation.
  • Plaintiffs sued Ocean Harbor in state court for breach of contract and bad faith denial; defendant removed the case to federal court and moved for summary judgment.
  • The court reviewed all facts in the light most favorable to the Plaintiffs (the non-moving party) in considering summary judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether policy exclusions bar coverage for damage Exclusions don't apply; defendant failed to investigate Damage was excluded (wear and tear etc.); no "loss" under policy Genuine dispute; summary judgment denied
Whether the denial was made in bad faith Defendant acted unreasonably by not determining cause Had reasonable basis to deny; exclusions plainly applied Enough facts in dispute for jury
Whether post-denial evidence can justify denial Only reasons in original denial letter are valid Post-denial evidence supports exclusion Post-denial evidence not permitted
Whether sufficient facts exist for breach/bad faith Jury could find breach and bad faith given investigation Facts are undisputed; no triable issue exists Triable issues remain

Key Cases Cited

  • Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007) (sets standard for viewing facts on summary judgment)
  • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986) (explains materiality and genuine issue standards for summary judgment)
  • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) (describes moving party's burden on summary judgment)
  • Crossley v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 415 S.E.2d 393 (S.C. 1992) (articulates elements of insurance bad faith claim)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Smallwood v. Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance Company
Court Name: District Court, D. South Carolina
Date Published: Aug 4, 2025
Docket Number: 4:23-cv-06197
Court Abbreviation: D.S.C.