History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sliwinski v. Capital Properties Mgt. Ltd.
2012 Ohio 1822
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Sliwinski, a former Hunt Club tenant, sues Hunt Club for charging water/sewer after 2004 when meters were installed.
  • Plaintiffs alleged class action against all residents who paid water/sewer charges post-2004.
  • Motion for class certification was filed and later withdrawn; class certifications were challenged.
  • Trial court granted a Civ.R. 23(D)(4) motion to strike the class allegations for failure to plead Civ.R. 23 requirements.
  • The court found deficiencies in class ascertainability, typicality, adequacy, and commonality, and struck the class allegations.
  • On appeal, the court affirmed the trial court’s decision to strike the class action allegations and held the assignment of error was overruled.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court properly struck class action allegations before certification. Sliwinski argues the court erred in striking class allegations. Hunt Club contends the pleadings failed Civ.R. 23 prerequisites; pre-certification strike is appropriate. Yes, the court did not abuse discretion by striking the class allegations.
Whether Civ.R. 23(D)(4) authorizes striking class allegations pre-certification. Sliwinski cites federal practice; argues the court lacked authority to strike. Ohio law allows Civ.R. 23(D)(4) strikes when pleadings fail to plead operative facts. Yes, Civ.R. 23(D)(4) permits striking when required facts are not properly pled.

Key Cases Cited

  • Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories, 61 Ohio St.2d 197 (Ohio 1980) (appellate review presumes regularity without transcript when omitted by appellant)
  • Cubberly v. Chrysler Corp., 70 Ohio App.2d 263 (Cuyahoga 1981) (pleading can be subject to Civ.R. 23(D)(4) strike for failure to plead operative facts)
  • Ogan v. Teater, 54 Ohio St.2d 235 (Ohio 1978) (seven Civ.R. 23 prerequisites govern class certification; burden on plaintiff)
  • In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction Cases, 97 Ohio St.3d 465 (Ohio 2002) (establishes prerequisites for class treatment; abuse of discretion standard)
  • Warner v. Waste Mgmt., 36 Ohio St.3d 91 (Ohio 1988) (failure to meet Civ.R. 23 prerequisites requires denial of certification)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sliwinski v. Capital Properties Mgt. Ltd.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 25, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 1822
Docket Number: 25867
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.