Singhaus v. Zumber
2015 Ohio 4755
Ohio Ct. App.2015Background
- Angela Singhaus (mother) sought a domestic-violence civil protection order (DVCPO) on behalf of her two minor children against their father, Adrian Zumbar, after an incident on January 3, 2015.
- The parties share parenting under a 2009 divorce; incident arose when 15-year-old son P.Z. refused to surrender his cell phone, leading to a heated confrontation outside the home.
- P.Z. testified Zumbar grabbed, shoved, and swung punches at him; P.Z. called 911 and later said he feared his father and wanted no contact except through counseling.
- Zumbar denied any physical contact or intoxication, conceded he attempted to take the phone, and disputed portions of P.Z.’s testimony.
- Police responded, saw no signs of a struggle, and the city prosecutor declined criminal charges; an ex parte DVCPO was entered, later converted after full hearings to a final DVCPO protecting P.Z.
- Zumbar appealed, arguing the trial court erred in granting the DVCPO; the appellate court affirmed, finding competent, credible evidence supported the order.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (Singhaus) | Defendant's Argument (Zumbar) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether a DVCPO was warranted under R.C. 3113.31 based on domestic violence or threat thereof | P.Z. was physically grabbed, shoved, and threatened by Zumbar; testimony and call made P.Z. fearful — supports DVCPO to protect child | Zumbar denied physical contact, argued P.Z.’s testimony was unreliable and insufficient; stressed no criminal charges and his good character | Court held plaintiff met preponderance standard; DVCPO affirmed based on competent, credible evidence of domestic violence or its threat |
| Whether the trial court abused discretion in weighing witness credibility | Credibility of P.Z. and appellee support finding of domestic violence | Zumbar argued appellate court should not defer to trial court’s credibility determinations and complained about reliance on a minor’s testimony | Court affirmed deference to trial court’s credibility findings and discretion in issuing protection order |
Key Cases Cited
- Felton v. Felton, 79 Ohio St.3d 34 (1997) (plaintiff must prove domestic violence or danger by a preponderance of the evidence)
- State v. Awan, 22 Ohio St.3d 120 (1986) (credibility determinations are for the trier of fact)
- Seasons Coal Co. v. Cleveland, 10 Ohio St.3d 77 (1984) (trial court observes witness demeanor and is better positioned to weigh evidence)
- Masitto v. Masitto, 22 Ohio St.3d 63 (1986) (judgments supported by competent, credible evidence will not be disturbed)
- State v. Caldwell, 79 Ohio App.3d 667 (1992) (fact finder may believe all, part, or none of testimony)
- State v. Jamison, 49 Ohio St.3d 182 (1990) (weight and credibility of evidence are for the trier of fact)
