History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sherrell v. State
317 Ga. App. 571
Ga. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Patrick Sherrell was convicted by a jury of two counts of aggravated assault against his wife, C. S.
  • The charges related to the May 6, 2010 incident; prior related abuse from October 31, 2009 was admitted as similar-transaction evidence.
  • Sherrell and C. S. lived together in Shady Dale, Jasper County, after marrying in 2008.
  • C. S. testified to a history of physical abuse by Sherrell, corroborated by family, police, and medical personnel.
  • Sherrell appealed, arguing lack of venue proof, improper handling of letters under the continuing-witness rule, and ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • The trial court’s decision was upheld after a de novo review of ineffective-assistance claims and harmless-error analysis.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Venue proven beyond reasonable doubt Sherrell contends venue was not proven State argues venue was proven Venue established in Jasper County
Continuing-witness rule and letters Sherrell argues misapplication of rule invalidates verdict State argues proper objection; letters harmless Error harmless; no reversal
Ineffective assistance claim Sherrell claims trial counsel deficient and prejudicial State asserts overwhelming evidence shown; no prejudice No reversible error; ineffective-assistance claim denied

Key Cases Cited

  • Strozier v. State, 314 Ga. App. 432 (Ga. App. 2012) (venue and related evidentiary considerations)
  • Dunagan v. State, 255 Ga. App. 309 (Ga. App. 2002) (harmless-error analysis under continuing-witness rule)
  • Morgan v. State, 226 Ga. App. 327 (Ga. App. 1997) (continuing-witness rule and admissibility of documents)
  • Bollinger v. State, 272 Ga. App. 688 (Ga. App. 2005) (letters to go out in deliberations; harmless-or-not analysis)
  • Chapman v. State, 273 Ga. 348 (Ga. 2001) (harmless error review in procedural-rule contexts)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (ineffective-assistance standard)
  • Smith v. State, 247 Ga. 612 (Ga. 1981) (battered-woman syndrome considerations)
  • Chavez v. State, 306 Ga. App. 272 (Ga. App. 2010) (venue proof and related evidentiary considerations)
  • Adams v. State, 276 Ga. App. 319 (Ga. App. 2005) (evidence weighting and harmless-error considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sherrell v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 6, 2012
Citation: 317 Ga. App. 571
Docket Number: A12A1001
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.