History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sheddrick Harris v. State of Tennessee
E2016-01573-CCA-R3-HC
| Tenn. Crim. App. | Dec 9, 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioner Sheddrick Harris was indicted and convicted (jury) of first-degree murder and pleaded guilty to especially aggravated robbery; effective sentence: life without parole plus 60 years. Appellate and post-conviction proceedings followed.
  • Petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition asserting the trial judge had signed a search warrant (May 21, 2008) and later presided at Harris’s trial (Aug. 13, 2010), which, Petitioner claimed, deprived the trial court of jurisdiction.
  • Petitioner relied on Tenn. Code Ann. § 17-2-101 and Hamilton v. State to argue the judge’s prior action as a judicial officer created a conflict requiring disqualification.
  • The habeas court dismissed the petition, finding the judge signed the warrant and presided in his capacity as a criminal court judge and thus did not lack jurisdiction.
  • The court further explained that constitutional objections of the kind raised are typically cognizable in post-conviction proceedings (not habeas), and Hamilton addressed a constitutional violation remediable by new trial/post-conviction relief rather than rendering a judgment void.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial judge’s signing of a search warrant then presiding at trial deprived the court of jurisdiction, rendering the judgment void Harris: judge signed warrant and then sat at trial, so judge was disqualified and conviction/judgment is void State: judge acted as criminal court judge in both acts; no lack of jurisdiction; issue, if constitutional, is for post-conviction relief Court: dismissal affirmed — judgment not void; judge had authority; habeas relief not available on this claim
Whether the claim is cognizable in habeas corpus rather than post-conviction proceedings Harris: raised in habeas as jurisdictional defect State: constitutional claims like this are for post-conviction, not habeas Court: claim is cognizable in post-conviction; habeas improperly used; summary dismissal proper

Key Cases Cited

  • Hamilton v. State, 403 S.W.2d 302 (Tenn. 1966) (addressed judge signing warrant in inferior capacity and later presiding; constitutional violation remediable by new trial)
  • Archer v. State, 851 S.W.2d 157 (Tenn. 1993) (void judgment exists where convicting court lacked jurisdiction or authority)
  • Summers v. State, 212 S.W.3d 251 (Tenn. 2007) (distinguishes void judgments from voidable ones requiring post-conviction proof)
  • Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (U.S. 1978) (procedure for collateral attack on search-warrant affidavits)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sheddrick Harris v. State of Tennessee
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Date Published: Dec 9, 2016
Docket Number: E2016-01573-CCA-R3-HC
Court Abbreviation: Tenn. Crim. App.