Shawn Michael Walker v. State
03-14-00473-CR
| Tex. App. | Feb 6, 2015Background
- Appellant Shawn Michael Walker charged with possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver, four to two hundred grams.
- Tried in the 264th District Court of Bell County, Texas; jury found him guilty and sentenced to 55 years.
- Evidence located in the van included multiple methamphetamine packages, MSM cutting agent, and paraphernalia; Walker was an occupant and claimed the van belonged to his girlfriend.
- Walker admitted 0.28 grams of methamphetamine in his pocket; admitted ownership of the pink 5.64-gram methamphetamine; other drugs and paraphernalia were found in the van including a hot pipe and syringes.
- Detective Mallow testified as an expert on trafficking; total methamphetamine recovered was 105.62 grams, valued over $10,000; the State argued this showed intent to deliver.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency to prove possession with intent to deliver | Walker argues links are insufficient | Walker argues no single link proves possession | Sufficient beyond reasonable doubt to prove possession with intent to deliver |
| Sufficiency to prove possession with intent to deliver as a party | Indictment allowed conviction as a party | Insufficient to prove as a party beyond reasonable doubt | Sufficient to convict as a party as well as individually |
Key Cases Cited
- Evans v. State, 202 S.W.3d 158 (Tx. Cr. App. 2006) (factors linking to possession beyond fortuity)
- Branch v. State, 599 S.W.2d 324 (Tx. Cr. App. 1979) (review of evidence as a whole for intent to deliver)
- Brooks v. State, 323 S.W.3d 893 (Tx. Cr. App. 2011) (standard for sufficiency of evidence remains beyond a reasonable doubt)
- Clayton v. State, 235 S.W.3d 772 (Tx. Cr. App. 2007) (sufficiency of circumstantial evidence in possession cases)
- Sneed v. State, 406 S.W.3d 638 (Tx. App. Eastland 12th Dist. 2013) (quantity and related circumstances can support intent to deliver)
- Thornton v. State, 425 S.W.3d 289 (Tx. Cr. App. 2014) (remedial options when conviction for greater offense is unsupported)
