History
  • No items yet
midpage
2019 IL App (5th) 170321
Ill. App. Ct.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Mother (Crystal) and Father (Matt) divorced in 2013; they had a joint parenting agreement for their son A.S.; A.S. primarily resided with Father.
  • Father entered into a civil union with Kris Fulkerson in November 2013; A.S. lived with Father and Kris thereafter.
  • Father died in January 2017; Mother later denied Kris visitation despite A.S.’s wishes to live with Kris and her children.
  • Kris filed to intervene seeking visitation and allocation of parental responsibilities as a stepparent under the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (Marriage Act).
  • Trial court granted Kris leave to intervene; Mother sought interlocutory appeal, arguing the Marriage Act’s stepparent definition requires legal marriage, not a civil union.
  • Appellate court accepted certified questions and reviewed whether a civil-union partner qualifies as a stepparent with standing under the Marriage Act.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Kris) Defendant's Argument (Mother) Held
Whether a civil-union partner is a "stepparent" under the Marriage Act for nonparent standing to seek visitation/parental responsibilities Kris: Civil Union Act grants partners same rights/benefits as spouses, so she should qualify as a stepparent Mother: Marriage Act defines stepparent as someone married to the parent; civil-union partners are excluded No — stepparent standing requires legal marriage, not a civil union
Whether Marriage Act should be construed to include civil-union partners despite omission Kris: legislative intent of Civil Union Act equates rights of partners and spouses Mother: Omission in Marriage Act indicates legislature did not extend stepparent status to civil unions; parental rights are paramount Court: Strict construction required; omission means no extension to civil unions

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Parentage of Scarlett Z.-D., 2015 IL 117904 (standing requirements that restrict nonparents protect parents’ superior rights over children)
  • In re Custody of M.C.C., 383 Ill. App. 3d 913 (Illinois law recognizes a natural parent’s superior right to custody and control)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sharpe v. Westmoreland
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Jul 2, 2019
Citations: 2019 IL App (5th) 170321; 126 N.E.3d 690; 430 Ill.Dec. 602; 5-17-0321
Docket Number: 5-17-0321
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
Log In
    Sharpe v. Westmoreland, 2019 IL App (5th) 170321