History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sharfarz v. Goguen (In Re Goguen)
691 F.3d 62
| 1st Cir. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Sharfarz hired Goguen to build an addition; contract specified phases, permits, and progress payments (~$171,000).
  • Goguen delayed permits and misrepresented permit status to keep Sharfarz from canceling; Sharfarz feared winter concrete issues.
  • Construction proceeded despite cold-weather concerns; foundation later cracked; Goguen offered misinformation and a 5-year warranty instead of refunds.
  • Sharfarz paid the full contract price plus extra costs to complete work after Goguen walked away; he incurred ~$88,000 in damages.
  • State court awarded $272,745.50 to Sharfarz (trebled to $264,000 plus fees) under Massachusetts law; Goguen later filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
  • Sharfarz sought nondischargeability under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A); bankruptcy court ruled the $88,000 was nondischargeable; the BAP reversed; the appeal concerns causation and the nondischargeable amount, with remand planned.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Causation under § 523(a)(2)(A) Sharfarz proved cause in fact and legal causation. Goguen argued lack of proper causation links. Causation satisfied; both cause in fact and legal causation shown.
Scope of nondischargeable amount Nondischargeable amount includes damages beyond the $88,000. Only the $88,000 should be nondischargeable. Remand to determine exact nondischargeable portion and potential additional recoverable amounts.
Remand authority and process Remand needed to allocate damages and address other alleged costs. Appeal should resolve discharges; not remand ambiguities. Remand authorized; case to be remanded to bankruptcy court with guidance.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Spigel, 260 F.3d 27 (1st Cir. 2001) (test for nondischargeability under § 523(a)(2)(A))
  • Cohen v. De La Cruz, 523 U.S. 213 (U.S. 1998) (dischargeability scope includes treble damages and fees)
  • Field v. Mans, 516 U.S. 59 (U.S. 1995) (Restatement use in § 523(a)(2)(A) analysis)
  • Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279 (U.S. 1991) (burden of proof for nondischargeability)
  • In re Bank of New Eng. Corp., 364 F.3d 355 (1st Cir. 2004) (clarifies standard for reviewing bankruptcy rulings)
  • In re Werthen, 329 F.3d 269 (1st Cir. 2003) (bankruptcy appellate standards and deference)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sharfarz v. Goguen (In Re Goguen)
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: Aug 15, 2012
Citation: 691 F.3d 62
Docket Number: 11-9004
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.