History
  • No items yet
midpage
Seeger v. Lanham
542 S.W.3d 286
Mo. Ct. App.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Mother Sharon Lanham filed a paternity action (KRS 406.021) after a child was born in 2007; father Harry Seeger was served and litigation proceeded in Nelson District Court.
  • During the case Seeger retired (Jan 2011) and began receiving Social Security retirement benefits; the child began receiving dependent benefits of $1,204/month (Nov 2011).
  • The district court set Seeger’s current support at $409/month and treated $795/month (the excess of the dependent benefit) as creditable to Seeger’s pre-petition liabilities (arrears, birthing and child-care costs).
  • Lanham requested attorney’s fees; the district court denied fees. The Nelson Circuit Court and Court of Appeals issued differing rulings on credits and fees, prompting cross-appeals to the Supreme Court of Kentucky.
  • Supreme Court issues: (1) whether private counsel may bring a KRS 406.021 paternity action; (2) whether attorney’s fees are available in KRS Chapter 406 paternity proceedings; and (3) whether excess Social Security dependent benefits may be credited to pre-petition liabilities and what findings are required.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Lanham) Defendant's Argument (Seeger) Held
Whether KRS 406.021 requires county attorney/Cabinet to bring paternity suits (jurisdiction over the case) Statute's "shall" language means only county attorney/Cabinet can bring the action Private counsel lacked statutory authority; district court lacked jurisdiction Private counsel may bring paternity actions; "shall" requires county attorney/Cabinet to act only when complainant requests them. Court affirms jurisdiction.
Whether attorney's fees are recoverable in KRS Chapter 406 paternity actions via incorporation of KRS Chapter 403 (KRS 403.220) KRS 406.025 and references to KRS 403.212 incorporate KRS 403.220 allowing fees No statutory basis in Chapter 406; Chapter 403 fee-shifting applies only to proceedings "under this chapter" KRS 403.220 does not apply; Chapter 406 contains no statutory avenue for attorney's fees. Court reverses Court of Appeals on this point.
Whether attorney's fees are recoverable via remedies under KRS Chapter 407 (URESA/UIFSA) incorporated by KRS 406.051 KRS 406.051 makes remedies in Chapter 407 available, including fee provisions Chapter 407 fee provisions postdate original enactment; KRS 406.051 did not contemplate those remedies KRS 406.051 does not supply a basis for attorney's fees in Chapter 406 actions. Court rejects fee recovery under KRS 407.
Whether a trial court may credit child's excess Social Security dependent benefits against pre-petition liabilities and required findings Lanham: excess benefits should go to the child; any credit must be limited Seeger: excess dependent benefits, derived from his contributions, should be credited against his arrears/liabilities Trial courts have discretion to credit excess dependent benefits toward pre-petition liabilities, but must make specific factual findings and apply equitable factors (e.g., KRS 403.211(3) factors) to protect child’s interests; remanded for further findings.

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth ex rel. Stumbo v. Wilson, 622 S.W.2d 912 (Ky. 1981) (private counsel may prosecute paternity actions; county attorney enters only upon complainant's request)
  • Miller v. Miller, 929 S.W.2d 202 (Ky. Ct. App. 1996) (discussion of treatment of surplus disability/benefit payments for child support purposes)
  • Rumpel v. Rumpel, 438 S.W.3d 354 (Ky. 2014) (purpose and discretionary nature of KRS 403.220 attorney-fee awards in domestic relations)
  • C.D.G. v. N.J.S., 469 S.W.3d 413 (Ky. 2015) (trial court general authority and discretion in child-support matters)
  • Bell v. Commonwealth, 423 S.W.3d 742 (Ky. 2014) (equitable awards of attorney fees limited; fees require statute or contract)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Seeger v. Lanham
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 22, 2018
Citation: 542 S.W.3d 286
Docket Number: 2016-SC-000677-DG; 2017-SC-000146-DG
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.